Hank Kingsley
Undefeated
I'd give him Subban's spot.
That's why they don't let you have a vote.
I'd give him Subban's spot.
That's why they don't let you have a vote.
Pietrangelo is a complete player. Subban needs to work a bit on the Defense part.
Vlasic should be higher. Before he got hurt the Sharks had the Kings beat. Hedman has no business in the top 10. Pietrangelo should be in the top 5. I'd give him Subban's spot.
That's why they don't let you have a vote.
Pietrangelo is a complete player. Subban needs to work a bit on the Defense part.
Subban's overall impact on the game is much more positive than Pietrangelo's. Pietro's defensive abilities are highlighted by a purely defensive system. He's a fantastic player but he doesn't take over games like Subban can.
The single most desirable asset for any skater in the NHL is to create offense. Goals are hard to come by. Subban creates goals plain and simple.
But obvoiusly not as good or he'd be ranked higher in this poll.....
Norris scoreboard: 1-0 Subban
Big buck contract: 1-0 Subban
Subban's overall impact on the game is much more positive than Pietrangelo's. Pietro's defensive abilities are highlighted by a purely defensive system. He's a fantastic player but he doesn't take over games like Subban can.
The single most desirable asset for any skater in the NHL is to create offense. Goals are hard to come by. Subban creates goals plain and simple.
The Norris Trophy is strictly for the top offensive defenseman every year. The year Subban won it he led all defenseman in points. Which is why he won it.
I fail to see that it matters.
He won it.
Deal with it.
Probably going to win more.
It matters in this regard. The Norris has become a joke to me. It doesn't matter if a defenseman actually plays defense anymore. All the people who vote on the award care about is how many points they produce. So the glorified forward will win the Norris every year. It's like all the so called experts on prospects who have Griffin Reinhart low on their list. He's not going to put up numbers like Karlsson, but he's going to be a nightmare for forwards to play against.
It matters in this regard. The Norris has become a joke to me. It doesn't matter if a defenseman actually plays defense anymore. All the people who vote on the award care about is how many points they produce. So the glorified forward will win the Norris every year. It's like all the so called experts on prospects who have Griffin Reinhart low on their list. He's not going to put up numbers like Karlsson, but he's going to be a nightmare for forwards to play against.
The reason people are dropping Griffin Reinhart is because even defensemen who are strong in their own end but end up not putting up a ton of offense in the NHL usually put up big point numbers in the CHL. I haven't looked lately but traditionally it's been pretty tough to find a defenseman playing in a team's top 4 in the NHL (let alone top pair) who didn't score a lot in the CHL.
All I know is according to Arthur Staple of Newsday, Reinhart is a lock to make the Isles opening night roster.
The classic stay-at-home guys in the NHL have their place, but even their defensive value, to me, is overstated. I want a guy who can get the puck out of the defensive zone and moving the other way. There is a lot of defensive value to a good skater and puck mover for just that reason, and while Subban, for example, may not necessarily pass the defensive eyeball test, it is quite clear, especially in the numbers, that he is really good at making sure play doesn't stay in his own end for very long.
You can break up passes and block shots all day long, but if you can't exit the zone, or if you have to settle for just dumping the puck back to the other team in the neutral zone, how much good have you really done your team?
The classic stay-at-home guys in the NHL have their place, but even their defensive value, to me, is overstated. I want a guy who can get the puck out of the defensive zone and moving the other way. There is a lot of defensive value to a good skater and puck mover for just that reason, and while Subban, for example, may not necessarily pass the defensive eyeball test, it is quite clear, especially in the numbers, that he is really good at making sure play doesn't stay in his own end for very long.
You can break up passes and block shots all day long, but if you can't exit the zone, or if you have to settle for just dumping the puck back to the other team in the neutral zone, how much good have you really done your team?