Uhsplit
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure about Harvin. The guy is quick and has great hands, but he is too small and prone to injury.
I was surprised he was in the list.
I'm not sure about Harvin. The guy is quick and has great hands, but he is too small and prone to injury.
Actually a Seahawk fan related the topic to the Seahawks and you raised a stink out of it because you get some serious sand in your mangina over any conversation a Seattle fan dares to get involved in. YOU made this into something.... again.
I know I've said this dozens of times and I'll keep on saying it until it sinks in. This is the off season and most fans have gone off to do other things. Only the hard core and the fans still on the high of winning it all are left. It's our first championship and many of our fans are still looking to talk, read, and get involved in anything football still off that high.
This won't be the last time. Just deal with it. If you want a Seattle free zone go hang out on the Broncos forum, or better yet the 9'ers forum as most of us are banned from there. The general board will be as full of all things Seahawk as we damn well please.
So let me see if I get this straight, you cry over another Seahawk poster daring to make a comment on this thread that was actually directly related to the topic at hand, and then again in a follow up message, but it's us that makes these things into a pissing contest?
If you and the other haters would just stop crying every time one of us posts there wouldn't be any drama. How do you not see that you are causing these?
The poster in question asked how your team did against those top 10 nightmares and then posted a list of how his team did.
Which is not the topic of the thread. Rather, the thread topic is which ten offensive players in the league presented opposing defenses (hint: the word "defenses" means more than one defense) the greatest challenge. Surely you are smart enough to understand that the topic is not how the player listed in the OP performed against a particular team, aren't you? Only question is whether you are also honest enough to admit that.
Which is not the topic of the thread. Rather, the thread topic is which ten offensive players in the league presented opposing defenses (hint: the word "defenses" means more than one defense) the greatest challenge. Surely you are smart enough to understand that the topic is not how the player listed in the OP performed against a particular team, aren't you? Only question is whether you are also honest enough to admit that.
Thread title:
Top 10 offensive matchup nightmares
I disagreed that all of those selected created matchup nightmares against Seattle. For some of those players, we were the matchup nightmare for them. I was curious how other teams fared against the dastardly 10 spot.
Let's just say someone writes an article about the top 10 defenses in the league. Let's say the team you root for blew holes in some of those defenses. You shouldn't be allowed to comment on the results of those games?
Which is not the topic of the thread. Rather, the thread topic is which ten offensive players in the league presented opposing defenses (hint: the word "defenses" means more than one defense) the greatest challenge. Surely you are smart enough to understand that the topic is not how the player listed in the OP performed against a particular team, aren't you? Only question is whether you are also honest enough to admit that.
The point is this Seattle spin on everything is the inevitable spoils of war and has been amplified by the fact it was this cities first major sports championship since their NBA title in the late 70's. Your fans need to stop being so sensitive about it and just deal with it.
LOL You think that the topic is how those players played against Seattle? Are you dishonest or dumb?
No, I do not think that was the topic.
Thank you. I appreciate your honesty.