Tom Brady Negotiating with Roger Goodell for Settlement, NFL fears court

[Rock Strongo]

^In full meltdown mode...

3...2...1... this will be epic if this thing comes back wrong against OJ...I mean Brady.

im laughing, FYI.

a lot.

 

[Tgann69]

So you go with the "you are too stupid" come back. Guess I shouldn't expect much else. When somebody has nothing to add to the conversation this is what they turn to. You seem to use it almost exclusively. You seem to think it is going out of style and have to say it as often as possible before it goes away.

Look at us on the same side of the fence and all.....

 

[cdumler7]

yes, you are clearly a stupid individual.

Haha and again we go to the same thing. Could you at least come up with new material to entertain us with your trolling? You are like a comedian that decides the same routine used for years will keep people entertained. Funny at first but eventually it ends in a yawn.

 

[Money]

agree. I dont see a phone...He is acting like he has one though which is concerning I wonder who he is talking too?

This guy

 

[Rock Strongo]

so, following the normal protocol of formulating logical arguments and cases...and since burden of proof falls on the accuser...whos gonna provide this proof that brady smashed his phone?

 

[cdumler7]

Look at us on the same side of the fence and all.....

Haha uh oh well don't worry week 1 is coming soon and we will quickly be enemies once again.

 

[Rock Strongo]

Haha and again we go to the same thing. Could you at least come up with new material to entertain us with your trolling? You are like a comedian that decides the same routine used for years will keep people entertained. Funny at first but eventually it ends in a yawn.

you have no concept of burden of proof, huh?

 

[Tgann69]

Haha uh oh well don't worry week 1 is coming soon and we will quickly be enemies once again.

Im not I expect it...actually look forward to it!

 

[Caliskinsfan]

Phone records can be accessed without a phone.

My understanding is that these 'sources' simply speculated that TB may have gotten rid of his phone and the comment is being repeated out of context. There is no confirmed proof of anything either way at this point.

 

[Tgann69]

you have no concept of burden of proof, huh?

and your statement of "he did not destroy his phone" is just

 

[Rock Strongo]

"breaking news. my sources tell me tom, brady tried to burn his finger prints off with acid, to hide his guilt"

 

[handicappers]

Too bad none of us are cops, or we could get to the bottom of this phone business.

 

[Rock Strongo]

and your statement of "he did not destroy his phone" is ?

a defense/rebuttal to the accusation initially made that he destroyed his phone.

i have some law skoolin under my belt. enough to be dangerous.


you guys "he destroyed his phone" (initial accusation)

me "no he didnt"

you "your statement of "he didnt destroy his phone is what?"

 

[cdumler7]

so, following the normal protocol of formulating logical arguments and cases...and since burden of proof falls on the accuser...whos gonna provide this proof that brady smashed his phone?

How do you not get that a message board is not a court room? We have explained this many times yet you still seem to miss this simple point. You call us idiots yet you seem to be in this magical world that a message board must meet the criteria set up in the court system. I just keep shaking my head honestly that you continue to do this.

 

[Tgann69]

a defense/rebuttal to the accusation initially made that he destroyed his phone.

i have some law skoolin under my belt. enough to be dangerous.


you guys "he destroyed his phone" (initial accusation)

me "no he didnt"

you "your statement of "he didnt destroy his phone is what?"

Here is what you are missing.

"WE" are not saying Brady destroyed his phone...multiple sources are... again not "us".

"YOU" are saying Brady did not destroy his phone. Again "YOU".

So "you" have the burden.

see the difference or are you still lost?

 

[Rock Strongo]

How do you not get that a message board is not a court room? We have explained this many times yet you still seem to miss this simple point. You call us idiots yet you seem to be in this magical world that a message board must meet the criteria set up in the court system. I just keep shaking my head honestly that you continue to do this.

logic isnt strictly used in court rooms...i pray you know that.

 

[cdumler7]

Our side of the argument is that a source said that he destroyed a phone...now obviously this is not absolute proof but it is more than your side has at the moment. You saying this is stupid over and over doesn't mean it isn't true. All we did is on a message board report something that is news.

 

[cdumler7]

logic isnt strictly used in court rooms...i pray you know that.

You are not using logic though. It is logical that a guilty person would try to destroy evidence so this isn't a far fetched idea.

 

[Rock Strongo]

You are not using logic though. It is logical that a guilty person would try to destroy evidence so this isn't a far fetched idea.

like i said, youre just not bright. the world needs ditch diggers. grab a shovel.

 

[Tech_God]

BOOM! Suspension UPHELD!

Tom Brady's 4-game suspension upheld by Roger Goodell