tOfficial Huskers Bullshit Thread

[huskers1217]

very good idea thur HH..

 

[huskers1217]

maybe you should wait until Easter.....

 

[iruletheskool]

fellers.. i jest found a life en sech is all

 

[oaknightshockey1]

fellers.. i jest found a life en sech is all

time to get back to school now irule...by thursday i was convinced it was summer and i didn't have to come back

 

[iruletheskool]

Yup.. it sucks. Got a huge paper due this week that i didnt start cause it still feels like break

 

[huskers1217]

I got a paper due tomorrow will start on it tomorrow

 

[huskers1217]

Irule got a life = I found a cute bitch to have sexual relations with

 

[HawkeyeHater]

maybe you should wait until Easter.....

"Lets just make it to the bottom of the hill for starters"....... en sech

 

[HawkeyeHater]

Irule got a life = I found a cute bitch to have sexual relations with

 

[iruletheskool]

idk how long i can keep up w/ 3x a day en sech tho..

 

[HawkeyeHater]

3x a day is not enough sir...

 

[huskers1217]

idk how long i can keep up w/ 3x a day en sech tho..

shit..i masturbate 3x a day..u shouldn't have a problem there sir

 

[huskers1217]

LOL 2 irule saying...

i gotta take a break, time to post on SportsHoopla.....

 

[iruletheskool]

LOL 2 irule saying...

i gotta take a break, time to post on SportsHoopla.....

yup

 

[iruletheskool]

lol 2 ye fellers

 

[huskers1217]

im trying to do business law hmwrk now...is this shit even english?

Plaintiff explained the mention of the two cows in this letter by testifying that, when he wrote this letter, the order and letter of defendants were at his house, and, writing in a hurry, and being uncertain as to the name of the cow, and not wishing his cow watered, he thought it would do no harm to name them [**921] both, as his bill of sale would show which one he had purchased. Plaintiff also testified that he asked defendants to give him a price on the balance of their herd at Greenfield, as a friend thought of buying some, and received a letter dated May 17, 1886, in which they named the price of five cattle, including Lucy at $ 90, and Rose 2d at $ 80. When he received the letter he called defendants up by telephone, [*572] and asked them why they put Rose 2d in the list, as he had already purchased her. They replied that they knew [***7] he had, but thought it would make no difference if plaintiff and his friend concluded to take the whole herd.

The foregoing is the substance of all the testimony in the case.

The circuit judge instructed the jury that if they believed the defendants, when they sent the order and letter to plaintiff, meant to pass the title to the cow, and that the cow was intended to be delivered to plaintiff, it did not matter whether the cow was weighed at any particular place, or by any particular person; and if the cow was weighed afterwards, as Sherwood testified, such weighing would be a sufficient compliance with the order; if they believed that defendants intended to pass the title by the writing, it did not matter whether the cow was weighed before or after suit brought, and the plaintiff would be entitled to recover.

The defendants submitted a number of requests, which were refused. The substance of them was that the cow was never delivered to plaintiff, and the title to her did not pass by the letter and order; and that under the contract, as evidenced by these writings, the title did not pass until the cow was weighed and her price thereby determined; and that, if the defendants only [***8] agreed to sell a cow that would not breed, then the barrenness of the cow was a condition precedent to passing title, and plaintiff cannot recover. The court also charged the jury that it was immaterial whether the cow was with calf or not. It will therefore be seen that the defendants claim that, as a matter of law, the title to this cow did not pass, and that the circuit judge erred in submitting the case to the jury, to be determined by them, upon the intent of the parties as to whether or not the title passed with the sending of the letter and order by the defendants to the plaintiff.

This question as to the passing of title is fraught with difficulties [*573] and not always easy of solution. An examination of the multitude of cases bearing upon this subject, with their infinite variety of facts, and at least apparent conflict of law, ofttimes tends to confuse rather than to enlighten the mind of the inquirer. It is best, therefore, to consider always, in cases of this kind, the general principles of the law, and then apply them as best we may to the facts of the case in hand.

The cow being worth over $ 50, the contract of sale, in order to be valid, must be one where the [***9] purchaser has received or accepted a part of the goods, or given something in earnest or in part payment, or where the seller has signed some note or memorandum in writing. How. Stat. § 6186.

 

[iruletheskool]

if that post wasn't tldr, i would prob have understood it

 

[huskers1217]

im lost after the first paragraph...and i only cut and pasted like a 1/4 of it

well, i shall not be a lawyer when i grow up.

 

[HawkeyeHater]

Tldnr...

 

[HawkeyeHater]

me dog is a bed hog en sech