Fair point... but given the sheer number of saves that Johnson has blown this season, a closer by committee might actually be a lesser evil. In a sense, it's like diversification in investing-- you would spread out the risk that way.
(Oh, and a side note: Now that we have a 2-run lead, I actually wouldn't mind letting Johnson start the next half-inning. He might actually be able to defend that.)
Nah, no messing around, right to Hunter/O'Day.
what does that tell you about his at bats? or maybe they had a time game and 2 outs and wanted to walk a righty to get to a lefty?
im not going to fault any decision that says we take our starter out after 110+ pitches and put in a closer who has close to the most saves in the majors. it just didnt work out this time. sports arent an equation where something will happen every time you set it up, theres a lot of randomness in it.
Well, one possible strategy I had mentioned before is "Hunter for 2-inning saves / O'Day for 1-inning saves vs. R / Matusz for 1-inning saves vs. L." But this might have to be revised given that Hunter has struggled somewhat in July...
I can tell you that his strike zone has expanded drastically in the last 60 days. I can tell you that his strike out per game is way up since May, that he has dropped .40 points in batting average since the first week of June.
His home run production is down. His strikeouts are up. Every at bat statistic is trending unfavorably for the guy. This lineup is not murderers row. It's time they start to play like they realize that.
I've always said that pitch counts mean absolute dick. Especially when the starter is at 110 pitches and still striking people out. Pitch count is an absolute cop out to get the closer in - no more no less...
great game tilly
except for the fact that its the way pitchers stay healthy and dont throw their arms out in one outing. given all of the money in having healthy pitchers and winning games dont you think that people would have found out what the right number of pitches to throw was? i trust the mlb people to say 120 is close to a limit as there should be.
I'm not sure I buy all that. I think it is more about specialization. In 1968 Denny McClain won 30 games. He pitched 28 complete games that year. There was a time in MLB where your top three in the rotation were expected to pitch complete games.
Many of those pitchers had long careers.
I'm not sure I buy all that. I think it is more about specialization. In 1968 Denny McClain won 30 games. He pitched 28 complete games that year. There was a time in MLB where your top three in the rotation were expected to pitch complete games.
Many of those pitchers had long careers.