Needs Some Input For My Dynasty Draft

[ANGELAKERAMS]

Ehhhhh i semi disagree. He has weak spots for sure. But his vision was markedly better. I do think they move on from him. He is limited as a passer, but i think hes adequate when combined with his rushing. To me, its one of the more interesting story lines this year.

Thanks for the input guys.

I am concerned about Hurts and may end up dropping Mayfield because he’s not very reliable week to week, so I definitely need to address QB.

It will definitely be an interesting draft as this is a very competitive league and “sleepers” aren’t missed as they are in other leagues.

 

[SteelersPride]

Thanks for the input guys.

I am concerned about Hurts and may end up dropping Mayfield because he’s not very reliable week to week, so I definitely need to address QB.

It will definitely be an interesting draft as this is a very competitive league and “sleepers” aren’t missed as they are in other leagues.

then id be targeting your favorite qb in this draft, thats just me

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

then id be targeting your favorite qb in this draft, thats just me

yeah, just not sure who that is between Wilson, Fields and Lance.

if Lawrence happens to fall to me then it will be a no-brainer.

 

[SteelersPride]

yeah, just not sure who that is between Wilson, Fields and Lance.

if Lawrence happens to fall to me then it will be a no-brainer.

Everyone has a preference. I think you saw at least two of us have eyes for fields.

 

[tlance]

yeah, just not sure who that is between Wilson, Fields and Lance.

if Lawrence happens to fall to me then it will be a no-brainer.

I would take Fields and Lance ahead of Lawrence.

Wilson is a distant 4th.

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

I would take Fields and Lance ahead of Lawrence.

Wilson is a distant 4th.

Curious what your reason is for Fields or lance before Lawrence?

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Curious what your reason is for Fields or lance before Lawrence?

it may be as simple as that they are both mobile QBs...

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

it may be as simple as that they are both mobile QBs...

Lawrence is mobile as well.

 

[SteelersPride]

Lawrence is mobile as well.

Yup

 

[tlance]

Curious what your reason is for Fields or lance before Lawrence?

Just a feel that Lawrence may be a bit overhyped.

Don’t think he will be bad by any stretch but I do think the other 2 will be very good. And I am not as confident in that with Lawrence.

Besides, I think Lance and Fields are both stepping into stronger organizations.

 

[averagejoe]

You said 10 teams?
In our 12 team dynasty, Lawrence, Fields and Lance went before the 10th spot. Jyst FYI.

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

Just an update on my team.

I’ve been able to make a few trades to bolster my team.

i traded Mayfield, Young and my 2.10 for R. Wilson, Singletary and his 4.8

then, I traded Waller, R. Jones and my 3.10 for Donald, 1.4 and 3.4

and waiting on a trade to go through that will net me Reagor and 1.5 for Woods and my 1.10

planning on taking Pitts at 1.4 if he is still available and a rookie RB at 1.5

 

[SmokingMonkey]

and waiting on a trade to go through that will net me Reagor and 1.5 for Woods and my 1.10

not sure I like netting Reagor but I get the move since you said these are RB hungry managers, so you thinking Javonte or Sermon at 1.5?
Or will it be between Sermon and Carter for you?

as for Reagor, maybe last year was just a bump, but I don't think the Eagles would have drafted Smith if they thought they hit on Reagor from the previous draft

 

[averagejoe]

not sure I like netting Reagor but I get the move since you said these are RB hungry managers, so you thinking Javonte or Sermon at 1.5?
Or will it be between Sermon and Carter for you?

as for Reagor, maybe last year was just a bump, but I don't think the Eagles would have drafted Smith if they thought they hit on Reagor from the previous draft

Not sure I would push all my chips in on Philly/Reagor. New QB, new HC, and not a lot of elite skill players who can stay healthy.
I feel that trade brings all kinds of risks.
McVay throws to the WR 67% of the time which compares a whole lot better to the rest of the league. Plus I'm guessing McVay will feel a lot more comfortable with Stafford under center.

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

not sure I like netting Reagor but I get the move since you said these are RB hungry managers, so you thinking Javonte or Sermon at 1.5?
Or will it be between Sermon and Carter for you?

as for Reagor, maybe last year was just a bump, but I don't think the Eagles would have drafted Smith if they thought they hit on Reagor from the previous draft

My thought was he should be better in year 2, plus I have Hurts, so the QB/WR combo could potentially be good.

mad for the RB’s, I’m not sure who will fall, but I would take Sermon over Carter at this point.

 

[averagejoe]

plus I have Hurts, so the QB/WR combo could potentially be good

Not if there is a COVID forfeit. Even if its because of the opponent.

Dangerous imho to key in on Hurts/Reagor for fantasy power.

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

Not if there is a COVID forfeit. Even if its because of the opponent.

Dangerous imho to key in on Hurts/Reagor for fantasy power.

It’s a gamble no doubt, but it was worth it for me to jump up in the draft to secure another RB because there is nothing else available in the league.

the only vet RB available is Tevin Coleman, and I wasn’t even sure he would last to 1.10. And after the first 5 rookie RB’s, we all know there is a big drop off.

To get Reagor and jump ahead 5 spots was worth me trading Woods.

 

[SmokingMonkey]

It’s a gamble no doubt, but it was worth it for me to jump up in the draft to secure another RB because there is nothing else available in the league.

yup, the rookie you get at 1.5 will determine if you made the right call, not Reagor's performance vs Woods'

 

[HaroldSeattle]

It’s a gamble no doubt, but it was worth it for me to jump up in the draft to secure another RB because there is nothing else available in the league.

the only vet RB available is Tevin Coleman, and I wasn’t even sure he would last to 1.10. And after the first 5 rookie RB’s, we all know there is a big drop off.

To get Reagor and jump ahead 5 spots was worth me trading Woods.

I like the idea of getting a top rookie RB. How many you think get picked ahead of you? At worse 3 because you own the 1,04 also I believe and could be Chase or Lawrence gets grabbed with those early picks. Could be Pitts gets picked before the 1.04.

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

I like the idea of getting a top rookie RB. How many you think get picked ahead of you? At worse 3 because you own the 1,04 also I believe and could be Chase or Lawrence gets grabbed with those early picks. Could be Pitts gets picked before the 1.04.

The 3 teams ahead of me all need RB help/depth, so I would be surprised if they didn’t go RB.

I wouldn’t be shocked if one of them believed enough in Chase to take him, but Lawrence isn’t going that early.

burrow was the first to go last year at 1.10

im really hoping Pitts lasts.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

The 3 teams ahead of me all need RB help/depth, so I would be surprised if they didn’t go RB.

I wouldn’t be shocked if one of them believed enough in Chase to take him, but Lawrence isn’t going that early.

burrow was the first to go last year at 1.10

im really hoping Pitts lasts.

For fun how do you rank the top rookie RBs?