So could the preparation/scuffing of the balls play into this equation? I mean you claim he'll overthrow yet the 2nd half of the Colts game he was statistically better. Weird even the judge mentioned that today. Get ready for lots of Brady threads with your thinking. Yep every overthrow will be proof Brady cheated.Historically speaking, the change from 2003-2006 to 2007-present is a significant change. This correlated specifically with the rule change. You're right, until 2 or 3 years from now we won't know now. However, the stats seem to be more than a coincidence. I think it will prove out to be true in the next few years. Also, I think we may see Tom Brady overthrow receivers going forward instead of throwing it into the ground so often. LOL
Eli started whinning on draft day along with big brother and daddy. None of them have stopped yet. Actually PayAton has probably been the least of that whinning family.When Eli gets suspended, whines like a schoolgirl and drags the entire football world through a court proceeding for 7 months, it will be worth discussing
play with inflated balls. I would guess we will see their fumble increase significantly. If you look at how fumbles went down once they let QB's prepare the balls before the game (i.e. when Brady started cheating) and prior to that season it's significant. I bet it goes up this year now.
I'm not saying anything about that... You provided one out-lyer in the data. You tell me why he fumbled more than the others and that is your most logical answer. But statistically speaking, the fumble rate among Patriot players is almost a statistical impossibility when compared to the rest of the league since 2007. I don't have the report, sorry no link, but I did read it via a link from one of the threads on this board.
pats gave stevan ridley a different football i guess.Fumble rate plummeted with the rampant cheating so logically it'll return to league normal this season.
Brady's numbers will be anything but "league normal " however.
They will only continue to get worse. He leads the league in off-target throws and with the scrutiny and pressure of throwing regulation balls, I predict he's benched next season and retires.
pats gave stevan ridley a different football i guess.
explain ridley
go
Way to run away before answering the question about the Packers not fumbling more than everyone else.
He fumbled a lot and the Patriots didn't resign him.
I really don't think any increase, if there is, any will be significant. Belichick is a fanatic about fumbling and will sit players if they fumble.. I think that and the emphasis they put on those in terms of training are more important than any deflation.
you arent smart enough to understand.It's amazing that no other coaching staff/team cares about fumbling. No other team has placed any emphasis on decreasing their fumble rate. Only the superior minds of the Patriots' coaching staff has addressed fumbling as a problem.
you arent smart enough to understand.
the pats are one of a small group of NFL teams without A) a horse back or B) has not drafted a RB in the first round for a decade.
if a team has a high pick and a huge contract on a player (lacy, AP, lunch) they dont lose their job for a fumble.
shit, jonas gray ran for 200 yards and never got more than a token carry after being late for a meeting. think that happens to AP or lacy or lynch, or laveon bell?
this is you conceding to my intelligence.
Keep shoveling that horseshit...
ok. so he fumbled a lot. he really did. 9 times.
so he and brady used the same ball on the same formations, same plays. brady would hand that ball off to ridley and he'd fumble.
explain your take now.
ok. that destroys.,..well, obliterates...your claim it gave the team an advantage (i.e cheating). ridley fumbled. lots.I already did.
He fumbled a lot.
I already did.
He fumbled a lot.