Honestly could care less if it is an alt. Keep that petty stuff for the politics forum, and I know none of you are admins so it isn't of your interest either.
Well, I wasn't being petty, I was trolling to rustle his jimmies, which mission was definitely accomplished. But I am gonna be petty here. It's couldn't care less, not could care less.
Why are you posting under an alt account, @TeddyJackEddy ?It's couldn't care less, or could care less, it's an expression, not an English class.
You don't really follow baseball do you?You went from posting nothings to thinking your posts should be taken as gospel.
Colon is used up and his value as a mentor is very questionable.
Those guys were signed because ownership is too damned cheap to pay for good pitchers in their primes.
I doubt we could have competed if we'd signed 2 really good starters, but management forfeited any chance at competing by going cheap.
Long term none of those very promising pitchers traded for are progressing as hoped, how is that even mathematically possible ? Maiten is years away, we don't have much in the way of outfielders or power in the organization, it's not as strong a minor league cache as we thought just a year ago.
Honestly could care less if it is an alt. Keep that petty stuff for the politics forum, and I know none of you are admins so it isn't of your interest either.
Honestly could care less if it is an alt. Keep that petty stuff for the politics forum, and I know none of you are admins so it isn't of your interest either.
As for the actual Braves team this year, I really doubt they'll be worse than last year. They won't be good, but they won't be a 100 game clowncar team either. 70-something wins, imo.
You don't really follow baseball do you?
You don't really follow baseball do you?
Yeah, mostly depends how high you are on some of the younger talent they have mostly. That's usually where you can sneak in some wins ahead of the bookie/projection system.My bookie site had the over/under at 74.5 wins. I bet 500 on the over.
But, your assessment is close to what I see. I predicted between 78 and 82 wins. Competitive, but not contending.
Yeah, mostly depends how high you are on some of the younger talent they have mostly. That's usually where you can sneak in some wins ahead of the bookie/projection system.
the Georgia humidity and his knuckler wasn't a good combo.
Interesting. Niekro threw a knuckler in Atlanta for years. I think the difference is Dickey throws his a bit harder than Knucksie did. I've heard you mention the humidity a few times in regard to the knuckleball, but I don't recall hearing Niekro talk about the physics of humidity and his favorite pitch...?
I just read a couple articles about it. Dickey claims in one of them:Niekro was a good bit before my time, but I'd have to assume it's because Dickey's knuckler is a good bit harder than the traditional knuckleball. Guess it's harder to get a grip when you're throwing harder.
I remember them talking about when Dickey pitched in high humidity games, the ball was spinning too much and it was a lot more flat than when he pitched in more favorable conditions. A flat knuckle ball will be hit hard.
I just read a couple articles about it. Dickey claims in one of them:
Dickey noted that domes and places with high humidity are good for his knuckleball. Domes are good because of the lack of wind. High humidity is good because "the seams grip the air better."
He contradicts himself later in the article:
But then in another interview, Dickey seems to suggest that it has an adverse effect (although he could be referring to overly humid conditions making it hard for him to get the proper grip, as most pitchers see their K rates drop at very high temperatures, most likely due to sweat):
Yes, a controlled climate is (desirable) and a dome offers you that,” Dickey said. “But if it’s been open all day and then it’s closed at game time, all that humidity (gets) stuck there and that’s not good (for a knuckleball).”
Anyway, humid air is actually less dense than normal air (seems backwards but is true), so I don’t buy the idea that it would grip the seams more. And if anything, less drag should make the knuckleball have less movement (imagine pushing a beachball through water compared to air). But another thing that would cause less resistance on the ball is having the wind at Dickey’s back — which is the other number that pops out from the above movement table as causing Dickey’s knuckleball to rise. (Wind “in” on the above table, which is a combination of in from right, left, and centre field — if we isolate down to wind coming straight in from CF, pfz rises even higher to 2.16).
This supports the idea that higher humidity inside the dome makes Dickey’s knuckleball rise and become harder to hit, in much the same way that wind at his back does — but there’s something else with the dome closed that gives it sideways movement as well, away from right-handed batters. Or that’s my theory, anyway — for a much more rigorous look at the physics behind what makes the knuckleball do its thing, check out Alan Nathan’s site.
I just read a couple articles about it. Dickey claims in one of them:
Dickey noted that domes and places with high humidity are good for his knuckleball. Domes are good because of the lack of wind. High humidity is good because "the seams grip the air better."
He contradicts himself later in the article:
But then in another interview, Dickey seems to suggest that it has an adverse effect (although he could be referring to overly humid conditions making it hard for him to get the proper grip, as most pitchers see their K rates drop at very high temperatures, most likely due to sweat):
Yes, a controlled climate is (desirable) and a dome offers you that,” Dickey said. “But if it’s been open all day and then it’s closed at game time, all that humidity (gets) stuck there and that’s not good (for a knuckleball).”
Anyway, humid air is actually less dense than normal air (seems backwards but is true), so I don’t buy the idea that it would grip the seams more. And if anything, less drag should make the knuckleball have less movement (imagine pushing a beachball through water compared to air). But another thing that would cause less resistance on the ball is having the wind at Dickey’s back — which is the other number that pops out from the above movement table as causing Dickey’s knuckleball to rise. (Wind “in” on the above table, which is a combination of in from right, left, and centre field — if we isolate down to wind coming straight in from CF, pfz rises even higher to 2.16).
This supports the idea that higher humidity inside the dome makes Dickey’s knuckleball rise and become harder to hit, in much the same way that wind at his back does — but there’s something else with the dome closed that gives it sideways movement as well, away from right-handed batters. Or that’s my theory, anyway — for a much more rigorous look at the physics behind what makes the knuckleball do its thing, check out Alan Nathan’s site.