This must be your dumbest post of all time. I know its hard for you to combobulate this, but ain't no fun now that the patriot nation got the gun.
Such a big word for a little mind.
You didn't hurt yourself did you???
http://www.sportshoopla.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=14664&stc=1&d=1423993456
4-0 is still better than 4-2. By percentages of course. Joe is still the best but I put Brady behind him.
Such a big word for a little mind.
You didn't hurt yourself did you???
http://www.sportshoopla.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=14664&stc=1&d=1423993456
lol ok. whatever helps you sleep at night.
These teams today would crush those 70 and 80's teams and not even close
i agree, i understand the argument but lets be honest Pats won 2 superbowls not because of brady.
Sonny that doesn't fit their predisposed narrative thought.
No it wouldn't and I have no problem people putting Montana over Brady. I did for 30 years and finally switched order after this years SB. After overcoming a 14 pt deficit vs Balt in second half( never done before) and then a 10 point deficit in 4th Q vs Seattle ( never done before). I understand Pats got luck with the interception, but also NY got lucky with those 2 SB's wins. Guy is clutch and playoffs and has set every record there, with no name guys, 1 HOFer for 2 years in Moss on offense and 1 on D for a few years in Seau in again Free Agency, Salary Cap era
Soo much Pats bashing bullshit fell away after this SB win.
It's only the home schooled kids who keep repeating themselves now.
No it wouldn't and I have no problem people putting Montana over Brady. I did for 30 years and finally switched order after this years SB. After overcoming a 14 pt deficit vs Balt in second half( never done before) and then a 10 point deficit in 4th Q vs Seattle ( never done before). I understand Pats got luck with the interception, but also NY got lucky with those 2 SB's wins. Guy is clutch and playoffs and has set every record there, with no name guys, 1 HOFer for 2 years in Moss on offense and 1 on D for a few years in Seau in again Free Agency, Salary Cap era
These teams today would crush those 70 and 80's teams and not even close
Not if the 70's and 80's teams had HGH. Seriously, Joe Greene on Juice.....come on....
The ''guys are naturally bigger'' is a total myth. It's generally thought today that Wilt made his bones against 6'7'' and 6'8'' guys, but the fact is, the average NBA post player today is only a quarter inch taller than the average post player in the 60's
Babe Ruth was swatting 60 bombs a year in the 1920's. Barry Bonds was hitting 35 homers a year into his early 30's. Then he hit the sauce, and he's hitting over 70....in his late 30's??? LMAO, come on man. They cracked down on steroid testing in baseball, and how many guys hit 70 last year? 60? 50? 40? Everything in the 1920's wasn't fully automated, everything men did coming up was manual labor. I remember my Dad and Uncles when I was a kid, they didn't have 20'' biceps, but they all had some Popeye forearms...
A lot of the kids today start juicing while they are still in high school, nearly all of them when they are in college. Juice the players of the 70's and 80's like todays players and they are just as good or better. Bo Jackson and Deion Sanders came along, what, 25 years ago? Then came Randy Moss. Now there's Megatron. Every generation has their studs