The top 25 ranking of NFL GM's

[SteelersPride]

I've been burnt enough times by posters like yourself. So I googled one team. The Ravens. Weird, what do you think I found

come on man, hes come this far finally, not running for once.

 

[RememberTheKoy]

bro, learn to read.

See right there for you. I said you backed this point up. Weird take on your part, again. I know its hard to keep things straight sometimes.

You learn to read, you're quote was clearly in there by accident along with the quote of the post I was responding to. Realize how my post is in complete response to the other quote and not at all in response to anything your post says?

 

[NWPATSFAN]

come on man, hes come this far finally, not running for once.

My bad, why let facts get in the way of a good bs story?

 

[RememberTheKoy]

You chose to bring up 20 years. I just went with it. Do we want to take this out further to prove the Eagles mediocrity?

I didn't bring up 20 years. You brought up 20 years.

You do realize that 7 of the past 20 years the Eagles have been at or below .500? What is your definition of good?

 

[SteelersPride]

You learn to read, you're quote was clearly in there by accident along with the quote of the post I was responding to. Realize how my post is in complete response to the other quote and not at all in response to anything your post says?

jesus. The eagle is strong in this one....


he didnt bring up 20 years, but stated an argument using that reference point, and was wrong........doesn't count. right @Tapey

 

[NWPATSFAN]

I didn't bring up 20 years. You brought up 20 years.

Are you sure? Do you want to recant this statement? Ir
do you want me to smack you down again? This is becoming a habitual.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

Who am I kidding I can't resist slapping another Eagle fan around.

Who said this? Note the post number?

I didnt say that claim was, but about 95% of your others, are. But you dont back those up....here you for once did......irrelevant to the point i was making


then at least understand the point. Thanks.

What teams outside of the Patriots haven't?

Colts 6 of the past 20 years.
Steelers 6 of the past 20 years.
Seahawks 6 of the last 20 years.
Packers 5 (6 if you count a 8-7-1 season) of the last 20 years.


Besides those 4 teams and the Patriots there isn't any other teams who have had less than 7 seasons in the last 20 years that were at or below .500


Weird take.

 

[RememberTheKoy]

Who am I kidding I can't resist slapping another Eagle fan around.

Who said this? Note the post number?

I said it in post 155 literally quoting and replying to your post 152 where you brought up 20 years.

You do realize that 7 of the past 20 years the Eagles have been at or below .500? What is your definition of good?

 

[NWPATSFAN]

It was another Eagle fan who introduced it first.

My point being this is how posters debate. We don't cherry pick or move goal posts unlike our Philly special friends. Eagle fans introduced 20 years I went with it.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

EKA posted it first
One in the same

You tell us. Who do you think the Eagles let go unwillingly to make it happen? And be realistic, cause saying someone like Foles is dumb. No team could realistically keep 2 QB's making 20-30 million each so 1 had to go. The Eagles for 20+ years have targeted players to extend and have pretty much been able to get rid of players before their play lessened. Have they had some bad contracts? Of course. Have they made some mistakes with players? Of course. But, like I said, for the most part, players they've let go, have been by their choosing not by the cap hell so many here have been saying the Eagles are in.

 

[Tapey]

jesus. The eagle is strong in this one....


he didnt bring up 20 years, but stated an argument using that reference point, and was wrong........doesn't count. right @Tapey

I’m not sure why it didn’t notify me about this post, but fear not as I’m an avid fan of any thread where Philly dipshits are getting roasted.

 

[RememberTheKoy]

You do realize that 7 of the past 20 years the Eagles have been at or below .500? What is your definition of good?

It was another Eagle fan who introduced it first.

My point being this is how posters debate. We don't cherry pick or move goal posts unlike our Philly special friends. Eagle fans introduced 20 years I went with it.

Yeah you went with it and tried to make a point and I showed how bad of an attempted point it was.

 

[EKA]

You do realize that 7 of the past 20 years the Eagles have been at or below .500? What is your definition of good?

I'd say that's pretty good. 65% of the seasons over the last 20 years above .500. For the most part, they've been in playoff contention. Obviously there's been stretches where they sucked. But, nothing sustained. How many other teams have had 13 winning seasons in the last 20?

What you originally quoted from me to make this point was about cap management. You picked out 1 sentence out of an entire conversation and think you made a point. The real point of the post you quoted was to discuss cap management and who the Eagles had to let go unwillingly because they had cap problems. I said 20 years to go back to the start of Reid/Banner cause that's when we started to see the cap strategy we have used for years.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

Yeah you went with it and tried to make a point and I showed how bad of an attempted point it was.

No you didn't prove anything. If anything you helped strengthen my argument that Philly is a mediocre team at best. Why can't you accept the numbers? You should be happy we're still referring to them as mediocre? Their lifetime record both regular season and post season dispute that. They are not dominant. They are not elite...They are what their record says they are.

 

[ericd7633]

You chose to bring up 20 years. I just went with it. Do we want to take this out further to prove the Eagles mediocrity?

You're saying the Eagles have been mediocre the last 20 seasons?

 

[SteelersPride]

No you didn't prove anything. If anything you helped strengthen my argument that Philly is a mediocre team at best. Why can't you accept the numbers? You should be happy we're still referring to them as mediocre? Their lifetime record both regular season and post season dispute that. They are not dominant. They are not elite...They are what their record says they are.

arent they historically under 500

 

[NWPATSFAN]

I'd say that's pretty good. 65% of the seasons over the last 20 years above .500. For the most part, they've been in playoff contention. Obviously there's been stretches where they sucked. But, nothing sustained. How many other teams have had 13 winning seasons in the last 20?

What you originally quoted from me to make this point was about cap management. You picked out 1 sentence out of an entire conversation and think you made a point. The real point of the post you quoted was to discuss cap management and who the Eagles had to let go unwillingly because they had cap problems. I said 20 years to go back to the start of Reid/Banner cause that's when we started to see the cap strategy we have used for years.

Cool story.

But I've been all over this conversation. Providing everything from definitions of fluke and mediocrity to records and stats. Yet some want to come here and pick and choose what portion of a thread they wish to debate.

Yet all I seem to get when debating a majority of Philly fans is the cherry picking dance and a tremendous amount of speculation.

 

[SteelersPride]

You're saying the Eagles have been mediocre the last 20 seasons?

i got 195-140, and some really strong seasons over the last 20, feel free to correct my math

 

[RememberTheKoy]

No you didn't prove anything. If anything you helped strengthen my argument that Philly is a mediocre team at best. Why can't you accept the numbers? You should be happy we're still referring to them as mediocre? Their lifetime record both regular season and post season dispute that. They are not dominant. They are not elite...They are what their record says they are.

I don't understand, 3 teams (Steelers, Colts & Seahawks) in the NFL have had 6 seasons at or below .500 in the last 20 years, 1 team had 5 (Packers) and 1 team had 2 (Patriots). The Eagles have had 7 though so thus they are mediocre at best? There is no logic to that thought process.

 

[ericd7633]

i got 195-140, and some really strong seasons over the last 20, feel free to correct my math

Well that equals 335 games, so right off the bat I'd say that's incorrect.