geneh_33
Go Home Run Heels!
Baylor is about to get exposed. We'll see.
Putting too much on Sark for the ASU "debacle". ASU is tough at home and even Graham says the team played their best game with him as coach. After that, you only have losses to UO and Stanford, as everyone who plays them will. Why all the remorse?
In weird news UCLA freshman Miles Jack was named offensive player of the week for last week.
He played at Bellevue High School I believe. Shame UW missed out on him. Looks like he is having a really good freshman year. He has been even better than I expected.
He's been UCLA's best player. And this is a team that will have 2 first round picks playing on it.
Why is that other thread stickied?
Good to see a Washington product playing well. Would have been nice to see him do it for UW though.
FSU.
They have more offensive power. You aren't going to grind the clock down on Alabama like Stanford did against Oregon to win. Alabama will stop the run. That is how you beat tempo teams like Oregon, it's not how you beat Alabama.
Why is v.1 stickied?
west coast mod...err bias
1. Ohio St
2. Alabama
3. Florida St
4. Baylor
5. Stanford
6. Clemson
7. Missouri
8. Michigan St
9. Oregon
10. Arizona St
11. UCF
12. Wisconsin
13. Georgia
14. South Carolina
15. Virginia Tech
16. Louisville
17. Oklahoma St
18. Texas A&M
19. BYU
20. LSU
21. Houston
22. Auburn
23. Miami
24. USC
25. Fresno St
All right its time to stop the kissing and hugging, lets get back to the topic, who "fits" better Stanford or FSU to play Bama for the title????
first real opponent oregon played and they lost....they arent my thoughts but i see no problem with either of those rankings. maybe you should ask him in the voting discussion thread.
Speaking of "bias" I found myself perplexed by this...
Head gump honk 420 posts:
He just puts all the undefeated team up top and somehow moves Stanford up 1 NOTCH and OREGON down 7 NOTCHES. Now IF THAT DON'T PASS the "smell/eyeball test" then I'm not sure what does. What kind of ranking system or there lack of does he use OTHER THAN a "biased" one?
Food for thought?