The Derski
No Fat Chicks
What's different? Besides the unrealistic tv screens on the outside?View attachment 149682 I am kind of partial to the almost new ASU stadium. Year 2 or a 3 year build and coming along nice.
What's different? Besides the unrealistic tv screens on the outside?View attachment 149682 I am kind of partial to the almost new ASU stadium. Year 2 or a 3 year build and coming along nice.
Need to cancel the CCG. The conference winner will be crowned on 11/25, you southies can play for the Alamo Bowl invite
Got a hunch that the CCG will be much more competitive than the Apple Cup will be this year Wazzy.
View attachment 149682 I am kind of partial to the almost new ASU stadium. Year 2 or a 3 year build and coming along nice.
Is that a Coug looking too far ahead??? I thought the Big Sky would have taught you guys about that.....Well shall see, Saturday is the only game the rest of the way that remotely has a talent advantage and in Tempe the next weekend is the last game that we won't be favored by a touchdown. Doesn't mean we won't drop one but on paper UCLA and ASU are the only obstacles and if we win both of those the AC will be for the Pac 12 title. We can drop one between Cal and Colorado and it's still for the North.
If JR is not available all game, than this could be the first game all season for the Bruins that wont be competitive.Well shall see, Saturday is the only game the rest of the way that remotely has a talent advantage and in Tempe the next weekend is the last game that we won't be favored by a touchdown. Doesn't mean we won't drop one but on paper UCLA and ASU are the only obstacles and if we win both of those the AC will be for the Pac 12 title. We can drop one between Cal and Colorado and it's still for the North.
Jim Mora and the Lack of Accountability in the UCLA Football ProgramIf JR is not available all game, than this could be the first game all season for the Bruins that wont be competitive.
That said, the Bruins need to get their running on track against a pretty stout run defense because without it, the Bruins can't compete if Rosen is on the bench for any length of time like last week.
I'm guessing this could just be a Bruins fan perspective however looking deeper into it..... Both Browning and Falk are system guys... A lot of their success is due to the tenured Coaching and Systems they are in.In this order .... Browning (homer pick), Falk and then Rosen.
Rosen kind of reminds me of Manziel 2.0 with his attitude.
So your saying:I'm guessing this could just be a Bruins fan perspective however looking deeper into it..... Both Browning and Falk are system guys... A lot of their success is due to the tenured Coaching and Systems they are in.
Rosen is playing this year under the recently promoted Polamalu who is a first year OC. Along with the system change at Westwood, he has been performing well enough without any balance what-so-ever.
As for your attitude comment, I believe his confidence does come across as entitled, however starting a Manziel 2.0 naritive is totally unwarranted and unfounded.
He is in fact, just a 19 y/o kid.
Browning's a system guy? I suppose that makes sense if your system is dropping back, expertly working through your progression, and throwing to a spot on the field that the receiver will just happen to be at when the ball gets there.I'm guessing this could just be a Bruins fan perspective however looking deeper into it..... Both Browning and Falk are system guys... A lot of their success is due to the tenured Coaching and Systems they are in.
Rosen is playing this year under the recently promoted Polamalu who is a first year OC. Along with the system change at Westwood, he has been performing well enough without any balance what-so-ever.
As for your attitude comment, I believe his confidence does come across as entitled, however starting a Manziel 2.0 naritive is totally unwarranted and unfounded.
He is in fact, just a 19 y/o kid.
I'll drill it down for you, Rosen will be the better of the three in the NFL.So your saying:
Rosen > Browning
or
Rosen + System < Browning + System
Or both?
I think that he is looking at the college success of Peterson's QB's and their lack of success in the NFL to conclude that a QB under Peterson must be a product of his system......but that's just a guessBrowning's a system guy? I suppose that makes sense if your system is dropping back, expertly working through your progression, and throwing to a spot on the field that the receiver will just happen to be at when the ball gets there.
If that's not what you meant, how is he a system guy?
I would be willing to lay all my vCash on that bet.......although it would take a long ass time to play out!I'll drill it down for you, Rosen will be the better of the three in the NFL.
I love your coach, I knew he would be a huge success if he ever moved to a P5 school.Browning's a system guy? I suppose that makes sense if your system is dropping back, expertly working through your progression, and throwing to a spot on the field that the receiver will just happen to be at when the ball gets there.
If that's not what you meant, how is he a system guy?
Thank the gods that Washington ended up with Petersen instead of Mora.Jim Mora and the Lack of Accountability in the UCLA Football Program
Jim Mora and the Lack of Accountability in the UCLA Football Program
Things like this are why UW is 6-0 and why UCLA is 3-3.
Okay, but the disconnect for me here is that's not a system that would help boost a QB's stats. It actually is closer to an NFL system than most other programs in the conference. If your point is he's well coached and his game has benefitted from that, I'll take it, and stick with him if I have to choose between the three.I love your coach, I knew he would be a huge success if he ever moved to a P5 school.
That said, Browning is in the second year of a proven system built on sound defense and a balanced attack. A system that develops players to grow and develop within that system.
Not quite the same as the Air Raid attack system at Washington State I know, so that is why I included the terms Tenured Coaching.
Further, if he's just the product of a system or good coaching then why did he also dominate high school football to end his career there as the all time TD king in prep sports history?Okay, but the disconnect for me here is that's not a system that would help boost a QB's stats. It's actually is closer to an NFL system than most other programs in the conference. If your point is he's well coached and his game has benefitted from that, I'll take it, and stick with him if I have to choose between the three.