- Thread starter
- #301
TheDayMan
Day Butt Ass the sadgaydayboy
Oh, is that what he was saying? That we've flipped oregon shit for uncle Phil daddy and are going back on that with what we're saying now? Yeah, not the same thing... their upgraded facilities aren't the same thing as getting a coach, facilities you can just throw money at, coaches are a little more complicated.I really don't know if there was an attempt at a new point here because I already destroyed what it appears you are trying to say, but then this is so mixed up I'm not quite sure there really was a point.
OU didn't 'force' people to spend money and no other team in the conference has attempted to outdo or even match their crazy facilities. The upgrade to husky stadium was in the works way back when Hedges was still here and the upgrade to our facilities was tied to that project. The reason we got it when we did was the TV money increase with the network, just like everyone else in the conference. Oregon had ZERO to do with it.
Oregon won't reach the level they did under Kelly until they hit on the right coach and even storied programs have had difficulties with that. Money won't change that in any way. Money won't have a single thing to do with it. They already have those facilities. I mean what more can they actually spend money on that they haven't already?
None of that is related in ANY WAY to the fact that money DID buy them were they are. How do you not connect those very simple dots? THE MONEY IS ALREADY SPENT. MORE DOESN'T DO ANYTHING. I mean it's pretty damned easy to see the difference isn't it?
Phew! Thought I was the only one. That's some jumbled mixed up nonsense isn't it?
I know we've given enough examples, but Notre Dame is still paying big money to a coach who hasn't been there in years, and it looks like they might be paying two former coaches after this year, they wish all they needed was money to fix the issue...