Backroads
The One Member
Yep...but in the end. it is as accurate as any other poll. I like that he combined them all that was coolI think you did a heckuva job putting this together
Yep...but in the end. it is as accurate as any other poll. I like that he combined them all that was coolI think you did a heckuva job putting this together
Since the original poster won't use the standard tallying method used by all major organizations (AP Poll, Coaches Poll, Harris Poll, etc.) and instead insists on his own arbitrary method, I've gone ahead and tallied all the votes from the voting thread using the standard tallying method.
So, the actual/fixed/corrected official results:
# ----- SCHOOL (1ST-PLACE VOTES) --- POINTS
1 ----- Florida State (16) --- 448
2 ----- Oklahoma (1) --- 395
3 ----- Oregon --- 373
4 ----- Alabama --- 369
5 ----- Auburn (1) --- 365
6 ----- Ohio State --- 344
7 ----- UCLA --- 322
8 ----- Michigan State --- 289
9 ----- South Carolina --- 280
10 ----- Baylor --- 251
11 ----- Stanford --- 247
12 ----- LSU --- 232
13 ----- Wisconsin --- 209
14 ----- Clemson --- 193
15 ----- Georgia --- 154
16 ----- Notre Dame --- 142
17 ----- Southern California --- 137
18 ----- Arizona State --- 125
19 ----- Mississippi --- 96
20 ----- Nebraska --- 94
21 ----- Oklahoma State --- 82
22 ----- Iowa --- 81
23 (tie) Washington --- 60
23 (tie) Texas --- 60
25 ----- Duke --- 53
Others receiving votes:
26 ----- Kansas State --- 49
27 ----- Mississippi State --- 45
28 ----- Missouri --- 43
29 ----- Brigham Young --- 42
30 ----- North Carolina --- 38
31 ----- Louisville --- 33
32 ----- Texas A&M --- 31
33 (tie) Houston --- 24
33 (tie) Florida --- 24
33 (tie) UCF --- 24
36 ----- Michigan --- 22
37 ----- Marshall --- 18
38 ----- Texas Tech --- 12
39 ----- Oregon State --- 10
40 ----- TCU --- 9
41 ----- Virginia Tech --- 7
42 ----- Nevada --- 6
43 ----- Cincinnati --- 5
44 ----- Miami (Fla.) --- 4
45 ----- Boise State --- 3
46 (tie) Bowling Green --- 1
46 (tie) Arizona --- 1
(The total number of points is 5852, 2 more points than the 5850 points usually expected of 18 voters, because in post #15 of the voting, a voter put 3 different teams into a 25th-place tie.)
And yes, it is actually less credible, even with many polls to compile. The type of problem Smart already showed still holds even when there are many voters, as the following example demonstrates.
Consider 20 voters, in which a team gets ranked
18, 20, 20, 20, 21,
22, 23, 23, 23, 24,
24, 24, 25, UR, UR,
UR, UR, UR, UR, UR
In the point summation system that all the major organizations use, this gets transformed into:
8, 6, 6, 6, 5,
4, 3, 3, 3, 2,
2, 2, 1, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0
and such a team will still end up in the 20-25 range of the compiled poll, since the unranked votes are all worth 0 points, which is only a few places worse than the approximate 3.92 points that the voters that rank the team give it, which is consistent with the voters that have the team unranked probably having the team in the 25-30 range.
But in the arbitrary system that you're using, this gets transformed into:
18, 20, 20, 20, 21,
22, 23, 23, 23, 24,
24, 24, 25, 47, 47,
47, 47, 47, 47, 47
The unranked votes are now WAY worse than the ranked votes, since there is a huge gap between 47 and 22.08, and the team will likely be pulled out of the Top 25 entirely.