Sharkinva
Well-Known Member
Shark, WTF are you talking about? What is massive about suggesting we take BPA and if that is a safety, take him? I've also said if its a Tackle, take him, a WR, take him. I would be OK with about 7 or 8 positions. But I'm not ruling out a pick because of position, either. You come across as so set on WR with the 34 pick that you refuse to consider anything else. Your excuses range from "massive change" (BTW for a 3 win team, kinda goes with the territory) to you don't want the team to take an OL for the sole reason of "protecting the franchise" (RG3) because you apparently think that Robert should have a cape and an S on his chest and do it all himself.
j_y... that wasnt directed at you or any one in particular. But when we have threads pointing out numerous guys we could draft who SHOULD be instant starters, to me thats more a want for massive change than anything else. And I dont refuse to consider anything other than OT because Im pretty sure the desperation for an OT would have people singing the praises of any OT we took simply because it was an OT. Do I think our WR corps is incomplete?? Yep. But I also dont think we are as screwed at OT, S, ILB. As far as protecting the "franchise", as I have said I dont hear Seattle fans screaming they need more O-line help. And Wilson took more sacks than Griffin.