apachef4
Well-Known Member
why do those pro athletes in question have to be "openly" gay ... cant they just be gay. I think if you polled all pro athletes youd get a majority saying they have no problem with gays on their teams, just dont tell us about it ... do they seriously want to challenge the locker room ethos whereby everyone conforms ... breaking news: if you dont fit in for any reason in team sports, youre not gonna last long
is there something to gain for them to announce this to the world
im sure in the history of pro sports as we know it there have been hundreds of people who were gay. And Im sure some of those hundred were all star calibre. Yes the attitudes that are prevalent in lockerrooms may have driven some out of their sports because they couldnt overcome the rumours but what is coming out of the closet going to solve
some gay athletes have succeeded and some failed ... memo to everyone ... same can be said about all aspiring athletes, gay or straight ... seems like the only time a gay athlete comes out is post career, and to me, their coming out is more about explaining why they failed as athletes and using the excuse of being gay as a crutch ... that coaches knew deep down they were gay and ostracized them and kept them off of this team or sabotaged their development because of it.
these excuses are similar to the excuses i hear playing slo-pitch from the fat dude who said he could been a pro "but it was all politics" ... lame if you ask me!
I'm not so sure that they "need" to be openly gay. Problem is, if they don't lie about it, then it becomes a big deal and is going to be a huge press fiasco whether they want it to or not. The article mainly deals with the inner torture the guy went through because he wasn't honest. If a teammate asks him: "Do you have a girlfriend?" and he responds: "No, I have a boyfriend", is that flaunting it, or just a statement of fact about his life?