Albuquerque Rams
Well-Known Member
Helps that he didn't face anyone good until the Finals. Sorry if that FACT troubles you.He made a finals 5 years before MJ age wise and 3 nba seasons. Sorry this FACT troubles you.
Helps that he didn't face anyone good until the Finals. Sorry if that FACT troubles you.He made a finals 5 years before MJ age wise and 3 nba seasons. Sorry this FACT troubles you.
*YAWN* All of this is just a distraction from the FACT that LeBron, depsite playing way longer, is less accomplished and decorated than the guy he's most frequently compared to. All he has going for him is empty cumulative stats.You are the one playing IF games here. Again the FACTS are those Pistons teams from the 2000s accomplished more than any team Jordan beat from 93 on.
Helps that he didn't face anyone good until the Finals. Sorry if that FACT troubles you.
What they did the year after is irrelevant. The fact is THAT year, they would have only been good enough for the No. 4 seed. Both of these teams are second round exits in the West.You thinking that is a fact shows how little you know about basketball. Go look up game 5 of the 2007 eastern conf finals and let me know how many points LeBron's teammates scored of the 18 in double OT.
The next year that "shitty" Pistons team won 59 games and once again lost to the team that won it all.
What they did the year after is irrelevant. The fact is THAT year, they would have only been good enough for the No. 4 seed. Both of these teams are second round exits in the West.
That Detroit team wasn't even better than the '89 Knicks, let alone the '89 Pistons.
And who did that team beat in the prior round? Cleveland.The next year that "shitty" Pistons team won 59 games and once again lost to the team that won it all.
And who did that team beat in the prior round? Cleveland.
So in other words, when LeBron actually faced someone worth a damn in the East - which wasn't very often - he didn't make the Finals.
Pot meet kettle. All we're doing is retaliation against you guys for doing the same thing. When LeBron's finals losses started piling up like corpses at a concentration camp, his Stans had to resort to denigrating every aspect of Jordan's career. So we respond in kind. You brought this on yourselves. You guys made it acceptable for players to lose as long as they had nice stats and we simply aren't lowering our standard to that.You're a fucking clown. Tell us more how the 47 win 89 Bulls that needed a miracle to win round one are evidence of anything. Answer the question, how many points did Lebrons teammates score in OT in game 5 of the 2007 ECF ?
The consistent issue with MJ homers such as yourself is you constantly have to try and run down teams LeBron beat or things LeBron accomplished.
Notice how non MJ homers don't do this? MJ was amazing, can easily argue he was the GOAT. But when you have to say absolutely dumb shit like the 89 Knicks were better than the 07 Pistons to make a point, you are arguing 100 percent from emotion and hate and nothing else.
Giving LeBron his due takes nothing away from MJ. None of us ever bicker with @thunderc about this because he doesnt then try shitting all over LeBron to make his case.
Your question is irrelevant.Answer the question I've asked you 3 times now.
Your question is irrelevant.
Pot meet kettle. All we're doing is retaliation against you guys for doing the same thing. When LeBron's finals losses started piling up like corpses at a concentration camp, his Stans had to resort to denigrating every aspect of Jordan's career. So we respond in kind. You brought this on yourselves. You guys made it acceptable for players to lose as long as they had nice stats and we simply aren't lowering our standard to that.
No, the question is actually irrelevant. For several reasonsNo it isn't. You said he had really good teammates so they should have scored at least half right? How many of those 18 did they put up?
No, the question is actually irrelevant. For several reasons
1. Game 5 was a major outlier. Aside from that one game, he averaged just 21 PPG on 39% shooting. Cleveland won the series anyway.
2. Boobie Gibson had 31 in the clincher, a game where Bron couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. He also has 21 in their Game 4 win, another game in which Bron didn't exactly set the world on fire.
3. LeBron was outright trash in the first two games, but Detroit only won both of those games by three points.
Ultimately, these details undermine any claims that his teammates were "bums" and render your question irrelevant.
Cop out excuse for people who have lost the argument.
Helps that he didn't face anyone good until the Finals. Sorry if that FACT troubles you.
No.
You cherry picked one stat that seems to support the BS agenda you want to push.
That isn’t how advanced stats work.
I think you may need to do some research and learn what a fact is.
Why are you using Pippen’s first 3 years?
The Bulls were very clearly not championship caliber until Pippen rose to all star level.
Neither won without a top supporting cast.
But LeBron came a lot closer.