dtgold88
Well-Known Member
First, his scoring numbers were similar but his shooting efficiency was much worse. Second, I don't think he should be criticized, but I'm not the one trying to make the claim Mobley was held back by Mitchell even though most of his numbers improved.I’ll ask again.
Do you think Barnes should be criticized for having similar numbers in years 1 and 2?
barnes is stagnant year 2 that's fine. Mobley improves but he was held back.
as I said regroup and decide what your rules should be...but follow the rules you go with.