Help me understand what 1970 or 1980 has to do with the here and now? I’m a Notre Dame football fan so I’m anxious and a little bit excited to hear your answer.32 finals appearances in team history would seem to indicate they are the MOST consistent contenders.
I do agree with your last statement. Would improve more than just your memory!
I was today years old when I realized that there are still some Lakers fans that think there is a possibility of another championship with LeBron.
Help me understand what 1970 or 1980 has to do with the here and now? I’m a Notre Dame football fan so I’m anxious and a little bit excited to hear your answer.
Next year is the last shot imo
The nfl didn’t allow itQuite possibly, but who knows? How many times did we try to fade Brady into the sunset?
Report I saw said they called Buss and she said to ask Rich Paul.......guessing he (and Lebron) put the kibosh on it.wonder what they'd had even offered
obviously it didn't get off the ground
Nah. It’s over. Give me the field.Next year is the last shot imo
Nah. It’s over. Give me the field.
No Spud Webbs or Mugsey Bogues anymore I suppose. Webb had a 43-inch vertical jump and he was what 5'5, 5'6. Dude could sky!!It’s really hard for guys under 6-6 now
It’s really hard for guys under 6-6 now
Under 6'6" is a little harsh. A lot of smaller guys can handle their own. Mitchell is an overall above average defender and he is a big dude with a long wingspan.And in the offs he got targeted and Utah would underachieve….
It’s just not easy for the smaller guys now when you get to that point
I think Mitchell gets a bad rap from Utah. He played less defense imo possibly for multiple reasons. He was carrying the offense and maybe defense wasn't harped as much as it is in Cleveland. Utah had a really good defense but that doesn't mean everything.
I said when the trade happened I think Mitchell could be a good defender and others said he was bad, based on past performances. That definitely isn't the case. The guy is capable and he is showing it. Averaging 1.9 steals. He is a solid on-ball defender but I would say even a better off-ball defender. Garland is the obvious weak link on that defense.
I know its almost assuredly not going to happen.....but imagine if LeBron just takes the mid-level from the Cavs for 2 years.I was today years old when I realized that there are still some Lakers fans that think there is a possibility of another championship with LeBron.
when Garland was not playing for almost 2 months Mitchell absolutely dominated and played solid D.Some of his weakness could be covered up by Garland getting targeted instead?