BHF
Well-Known Member
Great play by that DB as well. He doesn't get in their Rocket probably pulls that in.
Say what? He's not going anywhere.
It was also a really bad throw by Wilson, but people are losing sight of that.
I don't see any way they can keep him around after that call. I don't believe for one second that Carroll made that call either as a suggestion or as an override of what Bevell had called. He might be taking the blame for it in front of the media to avoid throwing his offensive coordinator under the bus, but Bevell is the offensive coordinator and playcaller, so unless there's audiovisual evidence that Carroll was the one to call that play, it's on Bevell. I can't imagine that he won't be the scapegoat in the locker room, possibly necessitating his firing if Carroll wasn't already contemplating it. A potential Lynch extension might also come down to a "him or me" ultimatum from Lynch.
Carroll is claiming the call came from him.
It was 2nd down and the Pats were already lining up in run stop, so they called pass. That they would of ran on 3rd and 4th downs.
You're still kind of scratching your head about that considering we were 2yds from the endzone and that slant pass was going to be right in the thick of those players lined up for a run up the middle. But it's not the first time we've heard of this happening with this team. We're they don't deviate from the script when they needed to and it costs them.
The Rams tried the very same stupidity in a regular season game against the San Diego Chargers when the run was working so well for us. Three yards away from a go-ahead TD and Shittenheimer called the very same play and it resulted in the very same thing ignoring the run that surely would have scored the TD.
It is frikin' beyond me how Carroll let that play go forward with Lynch just ready to run over the cheaters. Now we have to watch a bunch of cheaters accept another SB trophy they didn't legitimately earn. The game is forever tainted and I feel very bad for Seattle fans. You deserved to win that game.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
It wasn't a horrible throw... A lot happened... Lockette made an awful effort for that ball... He should have reached out with his hands to try and catch it... Looked like he was just waiting for it to hit him in the chest... And then the play from Butler was a fantastic play... He took a risk and jumped the route early... I personally thought Lockette made an awful attempt for that ball... I don't even know why we would throw it to him the last play of the game personally...
There was 12 of us at the party, including women and we ALL were calling for Lynch to get the ball every single time after he ran it down there to the two leaving 2nd down... Especially since our passing game was anemic up to that point... I couldn't believe they tried a pass attempt... The dumbest call in SB history... We have the best back in the league who has the least amount of negative gains in the league... Odds are he was going to push the pile forward...
It's obvious from your moniker that you are a die hard Wilson fan. While it was not a horrible pass as the other poster stated it was not a real good pass either. There is no reason to try to throw Locket under the bus to protect Wilson. In that type of situation you do not want to throw the ball too in front of the receiver in a crowd like that. You either want to throw it towards their body so they can protect the ball or towards their feet do that they are the only player who has a shot at it. If Wilson throws the ball a bit more at Locket he has a shot at it. Locket has no shot if his hands are competing with the defenders arms which is what happened. Locket was hit from behind in the process and was totally knocked out of the play. If the defender did not have a direct line to the ball then it's pass interference. It was not the most ideal ball placement in that sort of situation. Would have taken a perfect pass under the circumstances so it might have been better not throwing the ball at all, but the defender made a great play. So lets not throw another player under the bus in order to protect an illusion of perfection for Wilson.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
It's obvious from your moniker that you are a die hard Wilson fan. While it was not a horrible pass as the other poster stated it was not a real good pass either. There is no reason to try to throw Locket under the bus to protect Wilson. In that type of situation you do not want to throw the ball too in front of the receiver in a crowd like that. You either want to throw it towards their body so they can protect the ball or towards their feet do that they are the only player who has a shot at it. If Wilson throws the ball a bit more at Locket he has a shot at it. Locket has no shot if his hands are competing with the defenders arms which is what happened. Locket was hit from behind in the process and was totally knocked out of the play. If the defender did not have a direct line to the ball then it's pass interference. It was not the most ideal ball placement in that sort of situation. Would have taken a perfect pass under the circumstances so it might have been better not throwing the ball at all, but the defender made a great play. So lets not throw another player under the bus in order to protect an illusion of perfection for Wilson.
People are comparing this call to the one Carroll had at USC vs Texas in the Rose bowl when he left Reggie Bush on the sidelines on 4th and 2...
How do you let that happen? How do you allow that call? Literally just shit a superbowl away. Its unreal.
Probably a pretty fair assessment. 70% of the time that's an incompletion. 20% of the time the reciever adjusts and makes the play. Butler made the better play, and we fall into the 10% we witnessed.
You hate a coach that is the only reason people know the Seahawks exist? Interesting...
That's Pete throwing himself on a grenade for his staff. He doesn't call offensive plays, and he sure as hell wasn't going to start with thirty seconds left in the Super Bowl with the ball on the one.