- Thread starter
- #5,721
If he was at odds with ownership regarding the direction of the franchise, then I think he should have left. I don't think that has happened though. I think ownership has depended on him to determine the direction the team should take.Well that is a interesting take. So am I to assume JD should have left on my to work for guys he 100% agree with. I am not in business for myself but as a non owner there has to be some severe deal breakers for me just to flat out quit
I think he wanted to spend more money but ownership said no. Or perhaps they said the time is not right as evidenced by the spending so far this off seasonIf he was at odds with ownership regarding the direction of the franchise, then I think he should have left. I don't think that has happened though. I think ownership has depended on him to determine the direction the team should take.
I guess we are all going to choose to believe what we want to believe in a situation like that.I think he wanted to spend more money but ownership said no. Or perhaps they said the time is not right as evidenced by the spending so far this off season
Last time that happened, where the Rangers were concerned, Ryan and Greenberg won out over Crane and Cuban in the bankruptcy trial.Looks like they may be burning the midnight lamp