threelittleturds
anteater
But, those stats don't make Ginn someone that can't be replaced. As Cobb is showing in GB, it isn't that hard to get that type of production from a rookie WR... or rather, it isn't that rare.
Oh, so when he returns kicks and punts, he's the only guy on the field?
we haven't had a decent return man since mcquarters was here. it's easy to say we can throw anyone back there and make plays, but that isn't the case. very underrated position, and critical given the playcalling.
1. I've already addressed the "we haven't had a decent returner since. . . " argument. It's stupid and flawed.
2. No one has said you can put ANYONE back there, but to suggest that Ginn's decency as a returner makes him valuable is asinine.
Well, we only have 3 healthy WRs right now, so that really doesn't say anything.
It also completely avoids the question. What does he do well?
I would contend he's not a great deep threat since he DOESN'T CATCH THE BALL.
He's our fastest WR. I also don't believe for a second he's able to break one for the distance. He might be more able to do so than Morgan (a healthy Morgan), but Edwards, Crabtree and Williams are all bigger threats to score, as are Davis and Walker.
How many times has Ginn caught a pass and you thought he might score?
Ginn is 9th in the NFL in punt return ave which is more than a decent returner. To me you're not settling with Ginn as a returner. If you don't replace him with someone better, you're now settling for less punt return production. Our previous punt returner situation provides an analogy for where we could find ourselves if Ginn is gone and nothing more is done to address it.
A key component to this offense is different personnel packages/formations to get favorable match-ups and create confusion for a defense. Just because we haven't seen a lot of four WR sets to date doesn't mean it won't be coming in the future, especially as the offense has attempted to expand in the past few weeks and work the ball down field. I'll have to check out the formations, but I thought there were more 4 WR today. But say we do use TE's to achieve this and not keep a fourth WR - then that potentially opens up a spot on the roster for a specialist who can improve the team.
The team is 4th (not 9th) in the league in yards per punt return. However that is a very dynamic stat. There are 8 guys that can pass him with one good return.
However, as I said earlier in the thread, Ginn gets pretty much what is blocked for him. The big return yesterday saw the first to get to him bring him down. He practically never makes guys miss.
And he's a BAD wr. Having him on the field as a part of the offense makes our offense worse.
The team is 4th (not 9th) in the league in yards per punt return. However that is a very dynamic stat. There are 8 guys that can pass him with one good return.
However, as I said earlier in the thread, Ginn gets pretty much what is blocked for him. The big return yesterday saw the first to get to him bring him down. He practically never makes guys miss.
And he's a BAD wr. Having him on the field as a part of the offense makes our offense worse.
This will be an interesting divide between posters I think.
Would you re-sign him, or, to make it a little more specific, at what price would you re-sign him?
I'd probably let him walk no matter the price.
I feel like everything he brings to the offense could be done by Kyle Williams, or a FA, or a draft pick, likely better than Ginn currently can.
With the return game, I don't know how much of the field position credit goes to him. He's not an explosive return guy. He's fast in a straight line, but doesn't have a lot of wiggle, and I question his balance. He seems to go down very easily when someone makes him change direction. He doesn't even have to be touched. If someone makes him cut, he either comes to a complete stop, or falls.
I don't think the return game gets hit all that much, if at all, if we go with Hunter, Williams or a draft pick.
He's easily the lowest priority for me as a FA that legitimately contributes to the team every Sunday (as opposed to someone that doesn't get on the field).
The team is 4th (not 9th) in the league in yards per punt return. However that is a very dynamic stat. There are 8 guys that can pass him with one good return.
However, as I said earlier in the thread, Ginn gets pretty much what is blocked for him. The big return yesterday saw the first to get to him bring him down. He practically never makes guys miss.
And he's a BAD wr. Having him on the field as a part of the offense makes our offense worse.
Ginn's making a house call today - Book it!
The house had a porch that extended out to the 4-yard line - That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
Even though Ginn hasnt had return since week 1. I gotta admit i still feel spoiled by it because i feel hes gonna do it every game.
I was there in person : ( i was going crazy. WHY couldnt he finish it!? WHY!?