Sunday night vs. SF

[Eiknarflin]

The run d was a little disconcerting, but they didn't break in the red zone, at least not the guys who started. That was a positive, for me.

 

[jarntt]

[QUOTE="Eiknarflin, post: 7077058, member: 5814"]Plus, no Smith, Leary, Free on O. That's seven out of eleven starters who didn't play. It wasn't as many on Defensive side, but there were at least four that weren't out there.

Meanwhile, from listening to the announcers, it sounded as though San Fran's starting O played the first two series and almost all of their starting D played the first quarter. Yet, we gave up only three points.

Not concerned, except with special teams. That's the part of the game that looked atrocious, at least to me.[/QUOTE]

I wasn't sure the exact number, but I thought it was almost as many on the defensive side. I fell asleep before the midnight replay, but if we assume this is the starting 11, who of these played. I didn't think too many. I know all the LBs were out

Hardy, T Crawford, Hayden, Lawrence
Lee, McClain, Hitchens
Carr, Scandrick, Church, Wilcox

 

[jarntt]

I know he had a couple of receptions, but I was disappointed Dunbar didn't get a couple of carries. We need to use him this year.

 

[UK Cowboy]

I think SF running zone read was a big help to their running game. The announcers mentioned that the Cowboys had spent little to no time working on defending it in practice. I'm actually excited about what looks to be a much improved pass rush

 

[tomodach10]

That was stupid. They better prepare for the zone read They play philly real soon!!!

 

[Manster7588]

That was stupid. They better prepare for the zone read They play philly real soon!!!

Or they just decided to play as vanilla as possible.

 

[tomodach10]

Or they just decided to play as vanilla as possible.

Or that lol