- Thread starter
- #1
they should because they have a shitty coachI know people think it's crazy, but Penn St should not drop in the rankings just because they lost.
Quality loss?I know people think it's crazy, but Penn St should not drop in the rankings just because they lost.
think colorado is now in the top 25
Colorado beat:
(1-4) Colorado State
(0-4) Nebraska
(0-4) New Hampshire FCS
(0-4) UCLA
That is some Art Briles Baylor level scheduling to get themselves ranked.
truth, however col state usually decent and rivalry, nebraska was prolly good when they scheduled, same as uclaColorado beat:
(1-4) Colorado State
(0-4) Nebraska
(0-4) New Hampshire FCS
(0-4) UCLA
That is some Art Briles Baylor level scheduling to get themselves ranked.
think colorado is now in the top 25
michigan squeeks again
does vt come back?
TTU kept up with their qb going down..........
how high does ucf keep climbing
first time? ggeeshI would rank them for the first time this year. It's their schedule being such crap that makes me shy about ranking them higher like others, but they did a decent job against Pitt and handled them the way a ranked team should.
first time? ggeesh
Quality loss?
They won’t, at least much, in the real rankings because the AP seems to love them. We’ve seen them struggle with App state, Illinois, and now they finally lost a game. I say send them down the ranks a bit.I know people think it's crazy, but Penn St should not drop in the rankings just because they lost.