- Thread starter
- #41
skinsdad62
US ARMY retired /mod.
then i would draft oneTrue but we get a game changer at LB . this is all speculation. No need to waste time on it.
then i would draft oneTrue but we get a game changer at LB . this is all speculation. No need to waste time on it.
Given my druthers I'd rather have Allen/Sweat/Chase/Smith over Allen/Sweat/Chase/Payne. If it were a Smith for Payne straight up swap. I'd break a nut trying to finalize that deal.the figures that were being put out there are excessive , but your statement is true for the sake of argument i believe allens contract came in 2 mill lower per year then the per year avg that was talked about originally
my point is why not use the 17 mil you would have to pay smith and keep payne ? its about the same money
i dont think its a money issue . we can keep them all . its a choice issue meaning they want to put the resources elsewhere by choice
that was my point
While being paid like a 1st round draft pick. He has three more years on his contract plus an option year.
If only it were that easy. And for some teams it is. We're not those teams though. Smith could be the next best thing to drafting a stud LB, but unlike drafting one. We don't have to hope he can ball, we know Smith can ball.then i would draft one
Attention shoppers! Possible solution in post #45.
Woah! You ready to pay this cat because I know some other dudes who are watchingGive them 2024 1st rounder and Jamin Davis