Broncosr0k
Well-Known Member
Wazzu,
Did I not give your defense enough credit? Should I start a thread talking about how awesome they are?
My saltiness comes from the themes seen on the general board. One, Wazzu, wants less talk about the deflation scandal and more discussion on the SB (given that there was only a week and a half left before the game). Then he/she proceeds to make a thread that express disapproval at the comparison, by the media trying to fill a week and a half with stories, of Blount and Lynch.
In this thread the opening post smacks of "We beat one, if they are the same, we will beat the other."
If you are taking saltiness from my posts you can get some thicker skin. You talked about your rudimentary research of the offenses and some people corrected (or expanded, if you please) your initial assumptions. That explains some of my first post, the second was merely using your own logic. You stated it took an improbable 3rd and 20 for Dallas to win. Likewise, it took some improbable plays for the seahawks to pull one out against the packers. If that is being salty, you are pot and I am kettle.
Playing the seahawks game against them has shown a little more success than going out and slinging the ball 50 times but either way you are talking about beating a very stout defense.
Did I not give your defense enough credit? Should I start a thread talking about how awesome they are?
My saltiness comes from the themes seen on the general board. One, Wazzu, wants less talk about the deflation scandal and more discussion on the SB (given that there was only a week and a half left before the game). Then he/she proceeds to make a thread that express disapproval at the comparison, by the media trying to fill a week and a half with stories, of Blount and Lynch.
In this thread the opening post smacks of "We beat one, if they are the same, we will beat the other."
If you are taking saltiness from my posts you can get some thicker skin. You talked about your rudimentary research of the offenses and some people corrected (or expanded, if you please) your initial assumptions. That explains some of my first post, the second was merely using your own logic. You stated it took an improbable 3rd and 20 for Dallas to win. Likewise, it took some improbable plays for the seahawks to pull one out against the packers. If that is being salty, you are pot and I am kettle.