- Thread starter
- #1
seahawksfan234
Radical Moderate
I was thinking about it and I really think the Seahawks should match any other offer Rice gets, assuming it is reasonable.
Before the 2013 season I had a strong feeling that Sidney Rice would be cut by this point considering his cap hit, but I think bringing him back on a reasonable 1 year deal makes a lot of sense for the Seahawks. There are no other vets on the market that could come as cheap as Rice would likely come, plus Rice already has chemistry with Russell Wilson.
Bringing back Sidney Rice on a 1 year deal I believe makes a lot of sense as he would likely not cost too much and he improves the Seahawks depth/options at WR considering his size. Rice has the obvious injury concerns, but for the 10 or so games he would be a solid starter and offer the Seahawks someone with decent size.
Sidney Rice is not the player he was in 2009 and didn't look overly impressive in 2013, but he would offer the Seahawks another option at a reasonable price.
Before the 2013 season I had a strong feeling that Sidney Rice would be cut by this point considering his cap hit, but I think bringing him back on a reasonable 1 year deal makes a lot of sense for the Seahawks. There are no other vets on the market that could come as cheap as Rice would likely come, plus Rice already has chemistry with Russell Wilson.
Bringing back Sidney Rice on a 1 year deal I believe makes a lot of sense as he would likely not cost too much and he improves the Seahawks depth/options at WR considering his size. Rice has the obvious injury concerns, but for the 10 or so games he would be a solid starter and offer the Seahawks someone with decent size.
Sidney Rice is not the player he was in 2009 and didn't look overly impressive in 2013, but he would offer the Seahawks another option at a reasonable price.