sonnyblack65
Well-Known Member
Yeah, Brady no longer has the Tuck Rule.
Wilson was better in his first 2 years than Brady.
Still stings I see Raider fan. That was karma from a game Oakland hosed NE on in 70's
Yeah, Brady no longer has the Tuck Rule.
Wilson was better in his first 2 years than Brady.
Another example of Seahawk delusion. Total fantasy
Still stings I see Raider fan. That was karma from a game Oakland hosed NE on in 70's
He isn't tom brady today, but it is fair to compare the two at the same point in time of their career. The stats alone may not be the whole story given the different era, but it does given enough to allow people to form an opinion.
You specifically question why some seattle fans get defensive about others opinions, but I see you and others always jumping on theirs. It's ok for both sides to differ and present their cases.
. I think the best argument for Wilson is the snippit about how you can't pin any losses on him. That's very rare. Wilson is a highly intelligent player. He's on the same page as his coaching staff. Trusts his teammates and knows his role. All of those things get my respect. And all are better for conversation than stats...........But..........the odds of me going on and on about it in this thread are slim to none. I want to read willy nilly defensive homer posts. I may have been trying to draw another one out of Podunk. Maybe. But in all honesty I think it's fair if someone puts Romo above Wilson. I put Rivers, Big Ben and the standard four above him, even though I've never been a fan in any way of Brady.The OP made blanket statements that Wilson is the most overrated player in the league and was factually carried and made to look better than he is by his defense. Your same argument about why stats are less than reliable also apply here.
I hold no punches back when people come on with these ridiculous flame bait threads.
You can point out to them that statistically Seattle has one of the bottom 3 offensive lines in pass blocking last season and all of these blind haters refuse to even look at it because it goes against their supposed 'facts'.
You can point out that you cannot pin even one loss in his two years as his fault and that too gets ignored. Just look at last season and their 3 losses. The colts game Wilson drove the field to take the lead late in the game on the road. The defense couldn't stop Luck from driving for the win. Against the 9'ers both defenses played well all day and it was Earl Thomas' blown coverage against Gore that allowed the eventual go ahead score. It was entirely on him and he admitted it. That last loss at home against zona they had again taken the lead and once again the defense couldn't hold them. It took one of the plays of the year by Arizona to get that last score.
It is far too simplistic to say Seattle only wins because of Lynch and their defense. It's a team sport and you really can't have weak links and win a superbowl.
Do I think he is a top 4 QB in the league right now? No, but somewhere between 5-7 isn't unreasonable. Any ranking by fans or experts is speculative and no more right than anyone else. This is why it is an opinion and not some form of blanket fact.
I even tried to show him how easy it is to troll up people with so-called facts that really aren't when I said RW had the best first two seasons in the history of the league. Kind of easy to make statements meant just to rile up people isn't it? If you want that in a more opinion based way you would say something more like statistically he had one of the best first two year stretches in league history. As we well know stats aren't everything and the game today is quite different than it was 20 years ago so using just stats to compare players from different eras is hardly valid. That's a reasonable approach to a topic.
You can agree with the overall opinion of the OP, but you can't support how it was delivered or the rhetoric that goes along with it. Nor can you support making claims of fact that have no supporting evidence. Simply saying something is obvious so it's true is never going to win the argument.
You mean to tell me you don't feel Ray Hamilton roughed Kenny Stabler, Sonny?
I'm shocked.
Great memory my friend. The days of Russ Francis and Dave Casper.
At this point in time, Russell Wilson is the best QB in the league.
Wonderful football games back then... wish NFLN would find those instead of stupid Top 100 lists.
yep back when Men played the game instead of Primadonnas. The only way a guy a guy would come out of a game is when KO'd or paralyzed. Oh man another bad Oakland memory with Jack Tatum and my man Darryl
Yep, I couldn't agree with you more!! I live in Washington State and am a big Hawk fan, but I try to be realistic. IMO, Russell Wilson is not even in the top ten QBs, as of yet.It's more about defending the flag for most hawks fans I think. Could be wrong. Most hawks fans I've seen are not arguing RW is top 5 in the league. Those that are, are blind homers IMO.
Aaaaah, the good old days. I feel your pain
Yep, I couldn't agree with you more!! I live in Washington State and am a big Hawk fan, but I try to be realistic. IMO, Russell Wilson is not even in the top ten QBs, as of yet.
Don't forget Fred "The Hammer" Williamson, who played for the Chiefs and Raiders.yep back when Men played the game instead of Primadonnas. The only way a guy a guy would come out of a game is when KO'd or paralyzed. Oh man another bad Oakland memory with Jack Tatum and my man Darryl
SB, put your shades on, or better yet your blindfolds!!! LOL.Oldtimer please dont take any offense, but do you mind throwing a shirt on please
This is what epitomizes my perception of hawk fans. Even with all the out and out generosity for RW on here. I put him around 15-16.At this point in time, Russell Wilson is the best QB in the league.
Just wanted those stats out there as fact. Trent Dilfer Wilson is not. Nor is he Tony Romo. Romo does not win the NFC championship game last year. Remember how badly Seattle was outplayed the first half? Add in a few romo mistakes and SF would of been up 20.
Good research my friend!!Found this article. Five wildly different QB disciplines: scrambling, passing efficiently, downfield ability, winnng games, staying alive in the playoffs.
Most wins first two seasons.
Wilson 24
Andrew Luck, 22
Ben Roethlisberger, 22
Dan Marino, 21
Matt Ryan
Joe Flacco 20
Best Passer rating first two season
Dan Marino, 104.5
Wilson, 100.6
Roethlisberger, 98.3
Robert Griffin III, 91.5
Carson Palmer, 90.2
Best Average yards per pass attempt first two seasons (dispelling the game manager myth)
Ben Roethlisberger, 8.89
Kurt Warner, 8.61
Dan Marino, 8.48
Y.A. Tittle, 8.19
Wilson, 8.09
Most rushing yards first two seasons
Cam Newton, 1,447
Robert Griffin, 1,304
Michael Vick, 1,066
Wilson, 1,028
Vince Young, 947
Playoff starts first two seasons
Roethlisberger 6
Mark Sanchez 6
Joe Flacco 5
Wilson 5
Just throwing this out there. Also the big ben comparison is starting to come in focus. Big Ben and Little Russel, one in the same?