- Thread starter
- #21
SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
he needs a great camp IMHOYear 2 or 3 for him though, could be real impressive.
he needs a great camp IMHOYear 2 or 3 for him though, could be real impressive.
Even that might not help this year.he needs a great camp IMHO
as do i, and i think they like barberEven that might not help this year.
I have doubts Koetter is still there by November.
Who did the Broncos lose along the line?As of right now, Nick Chubb is going in the 9th-11th round from what I'm seeing, depending on the size of the league. The only obstacle for him is Hyde, and I'm not sure you can rely on him to be healthy past maybe week 5. If he goes down, Chubb would be a steal at that draft spot.
I'm not on the Royce Freeman train whatsoever. The volume won't be there IMO, and he has FAR too many carries under his belt. That doesn't bode well for an offensive line that just lost their best player.
It's hard not to love Jordan Wilkins as a great sleeper, possibly in the mold of a David Johnson who emerges from a crop of average RBs and grabs hold of the starting spot and doesn't look back - mind you, not to say he's as talented as Johnson, though he's a fine prospect with a good game that could translate well. Marlon Mack hasn't looked special at all.
Garrett Bolles left with a head injury.Who did the Broncos lose along the line?
Hardly their best lineman, (Ronald Leary) and nothing definite that he's out for an extended period, rather hasty to say they lost him.
As of right now, Nick Chubb is going in the 9th-11th round from what I'm seeing, depending on the size of the league. The only obstacle for him is Hyde, and I'm not sure you can rely on him to be healthy past maybe week 5. If he goes down, Chubb would be a steal at that draft spot.
I'm not on the Royce Freeman train whatsoever. The volume won't be there IMO, and he has FAR too many carries under his belt. That doesn't bode well for an offensive line that just lost their best player.
It's hard not to love Jordan Wilkins as a great sleeper, possibly in the mold of a David Johnson who emerges from a crop of average RBs and grabs hold of the starting spot and doesn't look back - mind you, not to say he's as talented as Johnson, though he's a fine prospect with a good game that could translate well. Marlon Mack hasn't looked special at all.
My manDead wrong about Royce Freeman... Besides Barkley I see him being the 2nd best Rookie RB.
Probably includes ANY rushing attempts including QB and WR.I see 2 that are kind of surprising on there - Carolina and Indy. ... unless that includes QB carries.
This has never been about Denver not running the ball. It's about opportunity. I don't know that he does anything that much better than Devontae does.
lol OK. I'll take that avy bet any day of the week.Dead wrong about Royce Freeman... Besides Barkley I see him being the 2nd best Rookie RB.
Probably includes ANY rushing attempts including QB and WR.
But with that in mind, look at SEA.
Even with Wilson's 95 rush attempts, they are a distant 21 as a team.
It was still a surprising stat to me because I recalled reading a blurb how Pete Carroll loves to run the ball.as to Seattle..a mere 2 more attempts per game sets them in top 15. Easy to attribute that to only having McKissic and guys off the practice squad that couldn't get the job done. No use banging your head against the wall, your not going anywhere. Assuming Penny is worth his draft stock, a simple two more attempts per game is easily acceptable. Stretch that to 3 per game (also easily within reason) and suddenly they're knocking on the door of top five. Its not as gloomy as the numbers might suggest
very true, also a little shocked myselfIt was still a surprising stat to me because I recalled reading a blurb how Pete Carroll loves to run the ball.
You take away Wilson's 95 attempts and the Hawks drop below Miami.
I'm with the back-from-vacation Lefty.