Rodgers to meet with the Jets

[Southieinnc]

well if they went that route. They just ended their relationship with Love.

Green Bay should give away all their draft picks to get rid of Rodgers and have a last place team?
You think that Love starting with a bad team will make him happy?

 

[Schmoopy1000]

Green Bay should give away all their draft picks to get rid of Rodgers and have a last place team?
You think that Love starting with a bad team will make him happy?

I have zero faith in love.
but sounds like the Packers do.
I think starting over with neither would be best for the packers, but I am not a packers fan so I am happy they stick with Love.

 

[Inquisitor95]

No team should ever consider giving up a 1st to rent Rodgers for a year.

The Texans have entered the chat.

 

[Inquisitor95]

I have zero faith in love.
but sounds like the Packers do.
I think starting over with neither would be best for the packers, but I am not a packers fan so I am happy they stick with Love.

 

[PDay8810]

No team should ever consider giving up a 1st to rent Rodgers for a year.

Well...maybe since the Browns have their guy.

 

[Southieinnc]

I have zero faith in love.
but sounds like the Packers do.
I think starting over with neither would be best for the packers, but I am not a packers fan so I am happy they stick with Love.

I have no idea if he will work out.
They need to give him 1 year to see what he's got.

 

[eaglesnut]

Rodgers can make the Packers very uncomfortable - but
They can just let him play. If he refuses they can suspend him. They have a contract.
Green bay fans likely are fed up with Rodgers and will blame him for whatever happens......

Playing him takes their franchise backwards. That's why they have zero leverage here.

 

[Southieinnc]

Playing him takes their franchise backwards. That's why they have zero leverage here.

The best leverage they have is saying no and not flinching first.
Jets gonna Jets!

 

[fastforward]

I guess we'll see more "choose love" helmets in 2023.

 

[Sportsguy9695]

I guess we'll see more "choose love" helmets in 2023.

Why? I think personally Rodgers would be the best choice just look at his resume in gb

 

[Southieinnc]

Why? I think personally Rodgers would be the best choice just look at his resume in gb

I think getting rid of Rodgers will help the Jets in 2024

 

[Sportsguy9695]

I think getting rid of Rodgers will help the Jets in 2024

How?

 

[Southieinnc]

How?

Salary dump and getting rid of a cancer......

 

[Sportsguy9695]

Salary dump and getting rid of a cancer......

So your saying Rodgers is a cancer?

 

[Southieinnc]

So your saying Rodgers is a cancer?

Cancer to Green Bay, cancer to his girlfriends, cancer to his family and soon to be a dissapoitment to the Jets.

"It might feel like a shoo-in to bet on a Rodgers-led Jets team to compete with the division-favorite Bills, but anything can happen in the NFL. His predecessor, Brett Favre, didn’t win the AFC East in his first and only season in New York."

 

[eaglesnut]

Rodgers haters getting a lot of air time spewing their fevered nonsense

 

[PDay8810]

Rodgers haters getting a lot of air time spewing their fevered nonsense

Or throwing out another opinion.
You've stated your ball washing opinion enough.

It's all how one looks at it. Based on all the Rodgers hype in 2010, I guess he least got his money.

 

[jerseyhawksfan79]

It was free agency. If you wait you miss everyone. What are you even trying to say with that statement? It's crazy.

The Packers are the ones with a player they have no intention of using. You must have been swayed by the Packers media blitz.

They could have had anyone in FA but they went the route of pleasing a QB that's not on the roster. The Packers can sit and wait till the Jets give them what they want. Why hand over a QB to a desperate team without a QB and give in to their demands? Packers play the waiting game and if the Jets don't move on it then Rodgers plays another season for the Pack, or he sits or retires. Either way the Jets will give up 2 firsts.

 

[jerseyhawksfan79]

No team should ever consider giving up a 1st to rent Rodgers for a year.

Correct but the Jets screwed this up by being over the top and getting players that Rodgers wants. They'll literally put up a big billboard saying we want Rodgers so of course the Packers are going to play hard ball.

 

[eaglesnut]

Or throwing out another opinion.
You've stated your ball washing opinion enough.

It's all how one looks at it. Based on all the Rodgers hype in 2010, I guess he least got his money.

Some people are talking about his girlfriends and nonsense like that. You can't point to any ballwashing because it didn't happen. Rodgers was MVP twice after the Packers wanted to replace him. The Jets can do whatever they want. The Packers have to get rid of Rodgers.