- Thread starter
- #1
Buffalo_Nickel_1
Well-Known Member
What shark, what rg3 doomers
What shark, what rg3 doomers
He was 7-8 on a nice sunny day with no pass rush.... Those are passes he is supposed to complete dontcha think?? When he proves he can be more than an option QB, then you can thump your chest. Until then he is still not a franchise QB as far as Im concerned.
by all accounts shark he was very good yesterday
Shark, personally I guess I'm confused on your glass half empty approach simply because, both RGIII and Shanahan made some poor decisions last year. Now if Rob had started the year healthy and we went 3-13, despite starting a joke of a secondary at S...and an unprepared ST coach...Then I'd understand your expectations much better. IMO you're microscope on this kid is as if he performed as poorly as Geno Smith. You put RGIII on the Jets, they would have probably lost the superbowl twice now in a row.
BTW, the Jets can die slow...I'm in no way saying the deserve a talent like RGIII.
Haillllll!
Also, I respect your opinions Shark.
Fair enough. I'll refrain from a jinx comment at this time![]()
Its easy dude... my take has always been this. We paid for Peyton Manning, and got a slightly upgraded Mike Vick with less mental issues but a bigger ego. I was fine with making a move up to get a QB... but I think we got the wrong guy. And to be honest, with the amount of talent we have on this team now outisde of QB, bobo the clown should be able to take this team to at least 8-8.
So in the end, he has to prove he is a franchise QB. And i admit I might be totally wrong about the kid. But Im not going to juggle his nuts simply because the Skins took it up the ass to get him in the first place.![]()
You may be right - you may be wrong but you don't evaluate the guy after two years especially since they were at polar opposite ends of the spectrum. At this time he is not Manning, Vick or anyone else and correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that quite a few QBs were not totally developed by their second year.
BTW - can't speak for anyone else, but if I grade him high it will simply be because of what he does on the field not because of how he was acquired. I felt great about him in his first year & not so good last season. This season? Who knows & I certainly am not going to get excited about how he does in a preseason game let alone a practice. This should be one exciting & interesting season.
Drew Brees Stats - New Orleans Saints - ESPN
Hmmm... Brees didn't do well until his 4th season (& he was not simply on the bench during all of this time). I guess that he was a bum huh? Again - you cannot totally judge a QB until several years into his career.
Last time I checked.. no one gave up half a draft for Brees. If we had gotten him at #6 where we were, I would be fine with it.
it doesnt matter what you gave up for him . that wont change how long it takes to mature no matter who it is
and if i recall a young peyton manning certainly pointed fingers at his o/line during a loss to pittsburgh in a playoff game
right now we dont know what we have for sure . we can win with year one RG3 year 2 need s more work
i think his career path will look something like randel cunningham's
Last time I checked.. no one gave up half a draft for Brees. If we had gotten him at #6 where we were, I would be fine with it.
I detest people that try and shift the blame. And I see alot of that in Ashburn/Richmond. Hell even Allen has come out NOW and said RG3 should not have started the season. A total 180 from his stance this time last year.