- Thread starter
- #1
Nyfan1980
New Member
@CLoprestiWFAN 2m
Rex on Pats' tempo: "Everyones talking about the Eagles. If anyones faster than New England, I haven't seen it." #NYJ
The Patriots had this offense for years now.
@CLoprestiWFAN 2m
Rex on Pats' tempo: "Everyones talking about the Eagles. If anyones faster than New England, I haven't seen it." #NYJ
Rex is obviously right that the Pats have played at a fast pace offensively for a number of years. Last year they led the league in average number of plays per game, which I think is the probably the best widely reported stat for measuring offensive tempo. (I guess that one could divide number of plays by time of possession to get a better measure of tempo, but I've never seen it reported.)
This past weekend NE ran 89 plays, the most of any team in the league. Ravens were second with 87 plays, followed by Philly and Detroit with 77 plays each. Add to that that Seattle, Chicago, Atlanta, and Indy all won their games while running only the 21st, 22nd, 26th, and 28th most plays, respectively, and it's not too clear that running more plays (presumably by playing at a faster tempo) is necessarily an advantage, is it?
Atlanta lost....
My mistake, of course, your are right. Still, running a lot of plays quickly doesn't seem to be highly correlated with winning.