iruletheskool
iruleiskool
Rex n Roy both mean King....
King Frazier walked on..
King Frazier walked on..
Rex is more of a complete back than Roy, that argument is silly..
Ever notice that both their names translate to King? Coweenkydink
Rex Burkhead is just tough, be nice having guys like abdullah, marrow, cross/heard (maybe) relieving him
You are right. The argument is silly. I would take Roy 100 times out of 100 over Rex. It isn't even close.
that is a bit ridiculous, both are about equivalent as far as what they bring to the table..
but to say Roy.. who was a 1 tool back.. is more complete, is asinine
that is a bit ridiculous, both are about equivalent as far as what they bring to the table..
but to say Roy.. who was a 1 tool back.. is more complete, is asinine
The durability question about Helu is kind of funny considering he played in every game in his last 3 years. Yes he had nagging things but he still played.
He only lost 6 fumbles (that I can find) in his 4 year career. Taylor lost 5 in 2010 alone.
He could run between the tackles but wasn't asked to. The offense we ran didn't ask for our RBs to do that. He was far more than a 1 tool guy.
1,357 yds by Burkhead last season was most by a Husker running back since... wait for it...
1997.