tw1st3d
New Member
That you for that wonderful post. We are all now smarter for seeing it
and let me give you another FA option UK
if we want to really make a move to fix safety
You have Clinton-Dix ( who I want) and Pryor in the draft. One will be there for us
which would mean no Donald for us in the 1st
However go get Melton who isn't going to command a big contract and likely takes a 1-2 year deal close to minimal to get his value back up
Sign Spencer back to a 1 year minimal contract So he can attempt to increase his value
draft a DE in the 2nd ( Kareem Matin will be there in the 2nd maybe the third as insurance for Ware)
Crawford will be back who can likely play any position on the line
Selvie will be there for insurance on Spencer
a NT for a 4-3 isn't hard to find or expensive and we have Hayden for depth
Draft Christopher Jones who will be there in the 3rd maybe the 4th ... to fight Carter and if Jones wins that battle put Carter n the strong side
and instead of paying 10 million for a safety .... we have devoted a 1st rounder to the position and improved our D-line and depth at a cost of around 3 million rather than fix one position at a cost of 10 million
Manster, I couldn't care less if you think I'm realistic or not lol. Nets has been on here several times outlining how we could get as far as $20 million under the cap this season. The Cap is going up another $27 million over the next two years. I'm not on here saying let's keep Ware, resign Hatcher and Spencer, keep Austin and go out and sign Byrd, Melton, Jared Allen and Ben Tate and trade up in the draft for Clowney. I'm saying that paying one fucking player, that would finally solve a problem this team has had for 10 years, and freeing us up to draft front seven multiple times in the draft is a good idea IMO. Maybe I'm dead wrong, but there are only a select few on this board who are always right like you are lol
it's in the posts, what's posted....football statements made
not to worry....there is always spelling
so eric like
I remain good with all stated opinions between us.
Spelling included.
the correct response would be the letter (B) onward through the fog
Byrd is a young all pro at a spot we've sucked balls at for 10 years. I like that a lot better than the talk of paying a drugged up Browner, Over the Hill Bailey or moving Carr to safety SMH. Fix the problem instead of putting more tape on it. What this team really needs if it wants to get on the right track quickly is a draft like Seattle's a couple of years ago when they pulled 4-5 starting caliber players
we haven't even cleared enough payroll to sign our 2014 draft choices so talking about signing a player that is going to be looking for 7-9M a year makes little or no sense
We can clear $15-20 million if we need to, but we wouldn't. Lets split the difference on your $7-9 million premise for Byrd and say $8 million per year. We sign Byrd to an 8 year $64 million deal. We give him a $16 million signing bonus with a first year salary of $1 million. Byrd would receive $17 Million in the first year, but his cap hit would only be $3 million. We wouldn't have to move Heaven and Earth to clear $3 million in space, considering as of this morning we are $2 million under.
we haven't even cleared enough payroll to sign our 2014 draft choices so talking about signing a player that is going to be looking for 7-9M a year makes little or no sense
We can clear $15-20 million if we need to, but we wouldn't. Lets split the difference on your $7-9 million premise for Byrd and say $8 million per year. We sign Byrd to an 8 year $64 million deal. We give him a $16 million signing bonus with a first year salary of $1 million. Byrd would receive $17 Million in the first year, but his cap hit would only be $3 million. We wouldn't have to move Heaven and Earth to clear $3 million in space, considering as of this morning we are $2 million under.
We can just keep doing the stupid as BS we've done forever. Right Jerry? The same fucked up deals we have in place you want to give to a S. Byrd will be 35 by the time your deal is up.
Just an example of where he is off on guarantees
Almost ALWAYS 1/2 the contract is guaranteed
Romo ( call it dumb or whatever) 108 million 55 million guaranteed
Just today
NFL Media Insider Ian Rapoport reports, via a person who has seen the deal, that the Vikings are re-signing would-be free agent Everson Griffen to a five-year, $42.5 million contract with $20 million in guaranteed money.
1/2 of any contract give or take a few million on either side but it damn sure wont be 1/3 or less
personally i can see the Cowboys releasing Ware and Austin which would free up 12.9M on this coming season's cap which gives us approximately 14.9M to spend on FA's and our draft picks.
It's hard to believe you post about guaranteed money when you are dead wrong about what you're talking about. Yes, a team could offer Byrd a $30 million signing bonus on a $68 million deal. Or they could do as I said and give him a $16 million deal and guarantee his 4th and 5th years higher base salary. Either way, the guy gets the same fucking guaranteed money. And yes, in the end, you'd have averaged $9-10 million a year for the guy, but if the guy earns the money, it's not a bad deal. But to state the Cowboys would HAVE to clear $9 million this year to sign the guy is laughable(even though they could do just that). You keep talking about drafting Dix or Pryor in the first round, which would be great, but I don't think there's a chance in the world Jerry spends a 1st on safety after drafting Wilcox last year