Monday Night Football: RAMS/BUCS

[NWPATSFAN]

See second bullet point in the below message I quoted someone on stating why Diggs' play was NOT pass interference and what would be. And then read what I actually wrote. Diggs was not running or restricting from the BACK of an opponent, he was making a play as Fitzgerald ran right into him. The conditions for both plays were 100% different.

I'll expect your well thought out apology within the hour.


Game Thread: - Cards @ Hawks -TNF- let the trash talk begin!!! (post 415)

I apologize for you having a bad optometrist. That's not what I or others saw?

 

[NWPATSFAN]

Fournette won't be seeing many more passes this year.

 

[Dr. Strangelove]

God Fournette is useless. Might get cut for the second time this year.

 

[molsaniceman]

God Fournette is useless. Might get cut for the second time this year.

bring back vaughn

 

[Sharkonabicycle]

I apologize for you having a bad optometrist. That's not what I or others saw?

Uh, what'd you see then? This was the PI against the Rams where the defender came in from behind, right? Not the one where Evans if anything pushed off and Ramsey was flagged.

Or are you talking about the Diggs play? I flat out quoted the rulebook and Diggs was 100% making a play on the ball (he dropped an easy INT). I know some of you like to make up rules (like the Packers player had an INT without both feet on the ground because he 'caught it'.... with... both feet not on the ground lol) so I dunno what to tell ya at this point.

 

[Schmoopy1000]

So why wouldnt it be a loss of down for throwing it twice. Seems like an advantage to throw it twice if you know you are getting your down back?

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

God Fournette is useless. Might get cut for the second time this year.

mccoys on the roster, may as well try it

 

[rmilia1]

I've never seen a guy get 2 completions on the same play before. Thats gotta be a record

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

So why wouldnt it be a loss of down for throwing it twice. Seems like an advantage to throw it twice if you know you are getting your down back?

Didn’t understand that, isn’t that pretty clearly illegal?

 

[Dr. Strangelove]

He is. Gotta wonder if it’s just an off year or a long term problem now with Lamar

I think the Ravens playcalling is very limited and the Titans showed people how to stop them.

 

[molsaniceman]

So why wouldnt it be a loss of down for throwing it twice. Seems like an advantage to throw it twice if you know you are getting your down back?

cause they turned the penalty down

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

This Mcvay man

wow

 

[Picklerick 2.0]

Stuffed

 

[Schmoopy1000]

Didn’t understand that, isn’t that pretty clearly illegal?

yeah & if he would have gotten a 1st down with it. they except the penalty & he gets his down back.
I think that penalty should go the way of intentional grounding. Loss of down & the penalty.

 

[Picklerick 2.0]

Tf are the rams doing?

 

[molsaniceman]

cmon throw to kupp dammit

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

3 and out
3 and out
3 and out

begging to lose this game

 

[Sharkonabicycle]

Wow the Rams went full derp fast.

 

[Sharkonabicycle]

Wow almost got it. Definitely gives the punter some room at least.

 

[Schmoopy1000]

cause they turned the penalty down

yeah. Thats my point.
The way the rule is enforced there is no reason to not try & throw it twice.