And I'm not going for this excuse he needs time.....Goff looked horrible year one,last year he did great.....Mahomes is killing it.......
Again, this is just weird logic. What do those QB's have to do with Trubisky? Shall we go through the list of QB's with early success who then sputtered out? Or QB's who took more time than others to hit their stride? QB isn't a rigidly timed thing. There's benchmarks you look towards. Year #1, year #2... but it all varies a bit case-by-case.
14 games in and you're evaluating him like this is the finished product. As if he's done growing. Not to mention, you seem to be doing this on a game-by-game knee jerk basis. If he plays two good games vs ARI and TB. Does that make him a proven stud? No. It would not. It's about a larger body of work.
Do I need to explain why that's an odd perspective to have?
if we played a good team last night,we're 0-2.....
And if Kyle Fuller catches a soft toss from Rodgers... we're 2-0 with a win over GB at Lambeau. See how that works?
And if he doesn't play well vs Ari and TB,does that mean he is trash or he still needs time to develop.....?
And we gave the game to GB,Sea gave us nothing...…..We earned it.
1-1 is not a bad place to be in right now considering the teams we have ahead of us...….Go Bears!!