dbldwn711
Well-Known Member
Is this the part where I say “SF owns the tie breaker with the eagles if it comes down to those two teams for the WC spot”?
well he is PE1's little cousin so............"every GM feels that way"
Saying things like this ^^ is the reason 99% of the posters roll their eyes at you.
Shark, I think you took a wrong turn in Albuquerque.Now we gonna flag Seattle? OOOOOOOOOOOOH HOLDING.... there it is...
The 2 seed now gets HFA if the 1 seed gets upset.Why would you want to get your QB or anyone important injured in a week 18 game and throw your entire playoffs in jeopardy? Finishing up the longest season in league history, you want to give your guys a much needed rest before the final stretch that is the playoffs.
#2 seed is so completely fucking lost in it's value now with it no longer giving a bye week.
The 2 seed now gets HFA if the 1 seed gets upset.
It is different than the past. With the 2 seed having to play 1 more game that's now 2 games they don't have to travel vs the 3 seed getting the first game at home than have to go on the road for the 2nd game and possibly 3rd. Plus like I said if the top seed gets bounced, than the 2 seed doesn't have to travel till SB if they make it that far.Which is no different than the past. They lose the bye week which was the most valuable aspect of that #2 seed. Especially now after they have extended the season an extra game.
It is different than the past. With the 2 seed having to play 1 more game that's now 2 games they don't have to travel vs the 3 seed getting the first game at home than have to go on the road for the 2nd game and possibly 3rd. Plus like I said if the top seed gets bounced, than the 2 seed doesn't have to travel till SB if they make it that far.
The second seed always hasn't had to travel until the Super Bowl if the #1 seed got eliminated. That hasn't changed at all. You're trying to act like having to play a game, especially after a 17 game season, but being able to play that game at home is actually as good if not better than having a bye week as the #2 seed.
The #2 seed is still better to have than the #3 seed or #4 seed but it isn't good to the point where if you don't have a chance to get the #1 seed to get the bye week that you decide to play your starters in the final week of what is going to be the longest season in NFL history instead of giving them some much needed rest before a playoff push. Imagine a team losing their QB or some other significant player to injury in week 18 because they were trying to play for the difference of the #2 and #3 seed when when the #2 seed doesn't give a bye anymore.
Answer this question.
Would you rather have 2 home games and 1 road game with a possibility of 3 home games in the playoffs or 1 home game and 2 road games in the playoffs?
Answer this question.
Would you rather have 2 home games and 1 road game with a possibility of 3 home games in the playoffs or 1 home game and 2 road games in the playoffs?
So you would have no problem losing the locker room by benching your starters, lose week 18 and go on the road against the team that won on week 18 if everything goes chalk to start the playoffs? Sure there's a chance you could win but explain that to your players if you lose cause you had to travel cross country when simply could have stayed home where the chances of winning is greater.First off the #3 seed also has the chance at 2 home games if the #1 seed loses just as you keep giving 3 possible home games to the #2 seed. That said of course I would rather the #2 seed road but I would not at all if the cost is having to play my starters in an otherwise meaningless week 18 game after the longest season in NFL history. I care more about having my guess rested, rejuvenated even maybe and healthier than they would be if they were to play in week 18. I don't want to risk losing anyone in that final week just to try to get a #2 seed that doesn't even offer a bye anymore.
So you would have no problem losing the locker room by benching your starters, lose week 18 and go on the road against the team that won on week 18 if everything goes chalk to start the playoffs? Sure there's a chance you could win but explain that to your players if you lose cause you had to travel cross country when simply could have stayed home where the chances of winning is greater.
I will say if you have Tom Brady and only Tom Brady than I can see playing backups week 18.
You're a dumb fuck if you truly believe players would rather sit and allow another team to jump them in the seedings for HFA.How thick headed are you? Players would much prefer to be able to sit and get a week of rest in week 18 before heading into the playoffs.
that and no team wants players he want to restYou're a dumb fuck if you truly believe players would rather sit and allow another team to jump them in the seedings for HFA.
You're a dumb fuck if you truly believe players would rather sit and allow another team to jump them in the seedings for HFA.