Wamu
whats-a-matta-u?
And I stand by that. Harbaugh is a great coach. There are 10-20 great coaches in CFB right now. Very few are elite.
Okay name the 10-20 "great coaches" out there right now. This should be interesting.
And I stand by that. Harbaugh is a great coach. There are 10-20 great coaches in CFB right now. Very few are elite.
That shouldn't be hard. I'll rattle off 10 "great" coaches off the top of my head. I'm going to include Saban and Dabo because elite coaches would also be considered great.Okay name the 10-20 "great coaches" out there right now. This should be interesting.
That shouldn't be hard. I'll rattle off 10 "great" coaches off the top of my head. I'm going to include Saban and Dabo because elite coaches would also be considered great.
Saban, Dabo, (in no order) Harbaugh, Dantonio, Kelly, Fleck, Franklin, Riley, Day, Patterson, Peterson (before he quit), Jimbo, Smart, Mullen.....
There's 14 off the top of my head. I think that already meets the great 10-20 comment I made.
I'd call a "good" coach someone like Pat Fitzgerald, though I guess an argument could be made that he's a great one. Or even Allen at Indiana or Brohm at Purdue (maybe?) or Fickell at Cinci. Those are good coaches, at lower end schools or maybe even major schools and right at the cusp of doing something great or being poached by a major school in the next coaching cycle.You can't mention a coach (Peterson) that's not longer coaching. If you're gonna do that why not mention Meyer & Bowden?
I guess your defintion of a great coach varies from mine. You mentioned several good coaches. And only three of them (Saban, Dabo & Fisher) have a complete CFB coaching resume. You know, have won everything a coach can. The only great coaches out there like I've said before are Saban & Dabo. It's them, and then the others.
I'd call a "good" coach someone like Pat Fitzgerald, though I guess an argument could be made that he's a great one. Or even Allen at Indiana or Brohm at Purdue (maybe?) or Fickell at Cinci. Those are good coaches, at lower end schools or maybe even major schools and right at the cusp of doing something great or being poached by a major school in the next coaching cycle.
The answer to that is - a lot of games, and has a great winning percentage. Despite the lack of upsets/championships.Back to what I was originally talking about. What exactly makes JH a great coach? He's won nothing. Just because you hope he accomplishes what he was brought to ann arbor to do (which after 5 years he's failed on all levels) doesn't mean he's a great coach like you keep claiming.
I’d argue Fitz is a better coach than Harbs.I'd call a "good" coach someone like Pat Fitzgerald, though I guess an argument could be made that he's a great one. Or even Allen at Indiana or Brohm at Purdue (maybe?) or Fickell at Cinci. Those are good coaches, at lower end schools or maybe even major schools and right at the cusp of doing something great or being poached by a major school in the next coaching cycle.
No matter how you rank them, calling them great coaches shouldn't be controversialI’d argue Fitz is a better coach than Harbs.
The question is why some people care about every over exaggeration on something so unimportant? The point being that they're fucking impressive walkways for students that tower over the Mississippi.
A pure gem from mNb09 (from the Bo Pelini >>> Jim Harbaugh thread, comment # 86)
"I believe I've argued he's a great college coach; one of the best 10-20 in the game. Which I still say he is"
There aren't 10-20 great college coaches right now. There's two. Saban & Dabo. Just more proof that homers will always be homers.
The answer to that is - a lot of games, and has a great winning percentage. Despite the lack of upsets/championships.
It did....sigh.It's the Trump Derangement Syndrome thing. The MSM has been SO Hyper focused on jumping all over every single one of Trump's little exaggerations that it's rubbing off on the rest of society, so odds are anyone ripping on you about it leans to the left or at least does not like and support Trump.
I mean, there are times when the information a person provides should be accurate and precise, like in a term paper, in a newscast, in a published article or book, when giving a public lecture, etc..
But in just casual conversation? Nah, give us all a break, I mean, what the fuck, chill out, relax. I'm from Minnesota, I knew you were exaggerating, subconsciously at least, but didn't care. What harm was your exaggeration doing? NONE, none whatsoever. I could tell you were just being expressive of how high it SEEMED to be.
Now I'm responding early, haven't read the next couple of pages, I'm hoping this didn't end up being a back and forth thing for the next 2-3 pages, lol. Now I'll keep reading and see, haha.
I'd say there is at least 3. And if you don't know who that 3rd one is yet? Well, you will soon.
That puts him at top 15 in the span of time he's been here nationally in winning percentage. Of 130+ teams, being top 15 would probably be "great" by most definitions.You're such a funny homer. So a .661 winning % for his college coaching career's great? He's also 2-5 bowl game (.286). His .723 winning % at meeeechegan isn't great either.
That puts him at top 15 in the span of time he's been here nationally in winning percentage. Of 130+ teams, being top 15 would probably be "great" by most definitions.
I hope you're right about Fleck. I've enjoyed watching his turnaround of the Gophers. I always root for all BigTen teams except for that program in ann arbor.
Great coaches have won things. The only thing JH has won is his Spring Game. What's really bizarre is if a coach from just about any other decent P5 program had JH's career resume you wouldn't be calling that great. But homer on!
Hey, I'm NOT taking his side, but the one thing I think that can be said, and is why Michigan fans like JH, and while an OSU fan might not be impressed, is that Michigan was seriously sucking wind before JH came. I mean, I'm going off the top of my head memory, but they were struggling to get to 8 wins, as far as I remember, and he bumped them up a notch immediately.
But I'd put JH on the same level/bar as Glen Mason. GM bumped Minny up a notch, up a level, from where they were before he got there, but then hit HIS ceiling. Seems JH was able to bump Michigan up a notch, up a level, from where they were before he got there, but since doing that, it seems he has hit HIS ceiling?
The second to last bridge is horrifying.Is this the tall bridge thread?