black francis
Well-Known Member
patriots fans are even angry in victory
Like the 2nd half of the AFCCGwhat a bunch of dumb asses !!!! so does the nfl keep that million dollars and draft picks ? i want to see brady get hit hard using a ball the baby doesn't like ! billy kilmer
Im a Giants fan...Why would I hate the Pats? I wish we could play them 25 times a season
With that said, all the NFL had to go on was the evidence destroyed by Brady......That was always gonna be tough to prove
The stain will never go away, the guy is a proven cheater, its Over johnny
Tom Brady in the 7th round of FF draft looking p good now
patriots fans are even angry in victory
Judge Richard Berman ruled this way because:
1. No evidence that Tom Brady did anything at all. The Suspension was for not cooperating and the judge asked the league what information was held back by Brady in the multiple interviews by Ted Wells. The league had no information or suspected information that he withheld.
2. The process of the Commissioner appointing someone to give a penalty so that he could hear the appeal was basically illegal. He basically told the league that the Commissioner can't give directions and then hear an appeal on something he had a hand in delivering.
3. There is absolutely no comparison of suspensions for drug use and suspected cooperation in an investigation.
4. Major point was that Jeff Pash not being available to Brady or the NFLPA was illegal. Pash reviewed the Wells report before it was available.
5. Another major point was that the league could not give any percentage of why they gave Brady a four game suspension....either for any part in the deflating of balls or not cooperating.
6. Finally, the NFL did not have any evidence of wrong doing that could or would be upheld in a court of law.
There's a PDF on various websites... I've already downloaded it and skipped through it.
Some key points that I picked up and likely missed others can fill in.
The attempt to compare Brady's infraction to sterods to justify the 4 game suspension was ripped apart as the BS it was.
Precedents based on the Jet's kicker Feeley(?) non-punishment on football equipment violation as was Favre's fine for non-compliance. Taglibue statement that he knows of no suspension in 40 years in the NFL for a player obstructing an investigation was bolded in my copy
Not be made aware of what punishments he could face for his offenses was cited.
The Pash things of course and the refusal of the NFL to provide all investigative documents to the Brady team were also cited.
I wonder if the CBA outline rules the Commissioner must follow with regards to suspensions for infractions that are not specifically mentioned in it (steroids, drug tests, etc)? Precedents are very difficult because each case stands on it's own.There's a PDF on various websites... I've already downloaded it and skipped through it.
Some key points that I picked up and likely missed others can fill in.
The attempt to compare Brady's infraction to sterods to justify the 4 game suspension was ripped apart as the BS it was.
Precedents based on the Jet's kicker Feeley(?) non-punishment on football equipment violation as was Favre's fine for non-compliance. Taglibue statement that he knows of no suspension in 40 years in the NFL for a player obstructing an investigation was bolded in my copy
Not be made aware of what punishments he could face for his offenses was cited.
The Pash things of course and the refusal of the NFL to provide all investigative documents to the Brady team were also cited.
Not that there is anything wrong with that.Oh Dear Lord, thats gay
patriots fans are even angry in victory
thursday nights game moved to Boston