- Thread starter
- #1
tallglassofwater007
Large Member
Didn't have anybody else to discuss this with so I brought it here....
Paul George isn't suspended for game 7. I think it is bullshit. Now I know he only took a couple steps onto the court, but the letter of the law is that he should be suspended. I know there is no intent, and all the analysts are talking about that he wasn't instigating or anything....
...but isn't the rule in place to take the judgement of intent out of the equation? It is pretty clear.. you step on the court and you get a suspension. I don't think it should matter what your intent is. Change the rule if you are going to let somebody get away with it for the sake of ratings.
Paul George isn't suspended for game 7. I think it is bullshit. Now I know he only took a couple steps onto the court, but the letter of the law is that he should be suspended. I know there is no intent, and all the analysts are talking about that he wasn't instigating or anything....
...but isn't the rule in place to take the judgement of intent out of the equation? It is pretty clear.. you step on the court and you get a suspension. I don't think it should matter what your intent is. Change the rule if you are going to let somebody get away with it for the sake of ratings.