dash
Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy bacon
Interesting that Reyes never had a 3 hit, 3 runs scored game in his 300+ games with the Jays like Tulo did last night. Nice debut Troy.
The other thing that strikes me from the table is the Pirates. Their salary has climbed up significantly in the last 3 years, and their win rank climbed correspondingly as well (no longer a 20-year-long sub-.500 team).The Cards just got a massive TV deal. They might be shooting up the salary column soon.
Something which strikes me about your table, Dare, is holy crap the Rays have been well-run.
Of the ten teams at the top of that list after the Yankees, all but two are higher in the salary rank than they are in wins. Of the bottom ten excluding the Astros, all but two are higher in the win ranking than salary. This chart is showing that teams that don't spend as much are punching above their weight class on a regular basis while teams that spend are not winning commensurate with their spending.
And they still haven't really succeeded. Two wild-card berths in that time, one playoff series. They still haven't caught the much higher-spending juggernaut in their division, nor beat either higher spending teams in the playoffs.Let's look at the Pirates' recent stretch of success.[...] Everything had to break right for them to succeed. There wasn't room for error.
Oh snap
They've still got a ways to go to catch the Yankees. Could put them in a nice spot to get the wildcard, though.
They've still got a ways to go to catch the Yankees. Could put them in a nice spot to get the wildcard, though.
It's the AL LEast, DS, I think everything is up for grabs.
I'm suggesting there's a consistency amongst teams that use the prospect route and teams that use the spend big route, and it goes against the whole "rich teams buying titles" concept.Are you suggesting that either the teams with the highest salaries should/deserve to have the best records or are you suggesting that an imperfect alignment dispels any and all complaints about payroll disparity?
Random variance can account for either.
Let's look at the Pirates' recent stretch of success. After NH came on as GM, the team got worse as he traded away their veterans, then they finally started to improve. But the big thing was that McCutchen exceeded expectations and became a superstar, an NL MVP. That was a stroke of luck. The bigger stroke of luck was signing him to an extension while he was still a good but not great player, the season immediately before his breakout. They did the same with Marte. Mercer's been surprisingly useful. Harrison came out of nowhere. Their reclamation projects in Liriano and Burnett worked out. Everything had to break right for them to succeed. There wasn't room for error.
That's the difference. If any of those things goes a different way, we're not talking about the Pirates as a playoff and World Series contender. They're rebuilding again.
It's a lot more rare for teams that have less than half the money to work with. Imagine how much worse it would be if the higher-spending teams' management would do their jobs as well as many of the financially strapped teams. And truthfully, before many of the lower-tier teams figured out how to survive in the current landscape, I recall it being much worse in the 90s and early 2000s, but I don't have the data at the moment to back it up.Not understanding your point about the Pirates - management did their jobs and things worked out well and that's rare? Isn't that what's supposed to happen?
It evens out because players want to test free agency even if they're with one of the big spenders to begin with (recent examples include Scherzer, Grienke, Cano, Ellsbury, Lester) so those teams wind up losing their developed stars, too. Of course, some manage to re-sign them and sometimes that works out (Kershaw, Felix) and sometimes it really, really doesn't (Verlander, Howard).It's a lot more rare for teams that have less than half the money to work with. Imagine how much worse it would be if the higher-spending teams' management would do their jobs as well as many of the financially strapped teams. And truthfully, before many of the lower-tier teams figured out how to survive in the current landscape, I recall it being much worse in the 90s and early 2000s, but I don't have the data at the moment to back it up.