Red_Alert
^^ Privileged ^^
Thanks Boone Pickens
![120531-locker-room-16x9-12p.nbcsports-story-612.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fnbcsportsmedia1.msnbc.com%2Fj%2FMSNBC%2FComponents%2FPhoto%2F_new%2F120531-locker-room-16x9-12p.nbcsports-story-612.jpg&hash=e4f28c715ab074bbb74fc7ee6efbfa4f)
If the Big 8 sucked, so did the SEC. Again, the SEC didn't become super dominant until about 2004. they had Tennessee and Florida in the 90s, that's about it. Georgia in the 80s.
Hell, most conferences all "sucked" compared to your definition back in the day, most conferences only had 2 or 3 good teams each year. Football back then isn't like it is today where conferences can be 5 good teams deep.
But go ahead waste your time digging up shit from the 1940s.
BamaTee
You're in the wrong thread ya clown![]()
2 things.
Anyone can agree on this. Cost doesn't always equal best. There are plenty of buildings and facilities that have been built around the world that cost top dollar, but ended up being eye sores and embarrassments.
While there is no doubting Uncle Phil has poured more money into Oregon's athletic facilities than any single individual has in the history of college athletics (over 500 million), all those millions hasn't instantly translated into "best". All their facilities look like Niketown stores. You walk into them and it's like you've walked into a Dubai hotel lobby with a bunch of Nike swooshes and marketing crap painted everywhere. You feel 0 tradition or history when you walk into them because they are specifically designed to sell you something. In this case, Nike. The fact they're purpose is athletic facilities is almost an after thought. For Christ sakes, the basketball arena is named after Phil Knight's son who never even went to the school.
All are designed by Uncle Phil's personal architect since the 1980s, Bob Thompson at TVA architects. They did his house, Nike HQ, and about everything else in his business empire, including all the new UofO facilities and Niketown stores. Every single building thus of course looks similar. UofO now resembles a boring corporate campus, more than a school's AD. It's devoid of those individual touches that work together to create something unique and the tradition you constantly build upon. When a group of alumni and the school work together on these projects. Especially in a university/college environment.
Sorry Ducks. You've all adopted "trailer park lottery winner" syndrome because of Knight's checkbook. Win the lottery, move out of the trailer park into a mansion, then try to brag about how hard you had to work to get those digs, and throwing money around to bring attention to yourselves. Expecting everyone who ooh and ahh over you, and pouting when they yawn instead. Trying to buy tradition, instead of working for it. End of day, everyone see's you for what you are. The Paris Hilton of colleges.
2 things.
Anyone can agree on this. Cost doesn't always equal best. There are plenty of buildings and facilities that have been built around the world that cost top dollar, but ended up being eye sores and embarrassments.
While there is no doubting Uncle Phil has poured more money into Oregon's athletic facilities than any single individual has in the history of college athletics (over 500 million), all those millions hasn't instantly translated into "best". All their facilities look like Niketown stores. You walk into them and it's like you've walked into a Dubai hotel lobby with a bunch of Nike swooshes and marketing crap painted everywhere. You feel 0 tradition or history when you walk into them because they are specifically designed to sell you something. In this case, Nike. The fact they're purpose is athletic facilities is almost an after thought. For Christ sakes, the basketball arena is named after Phil Knight's son who never even went to the school.
All are designed by Uncle Phil's personal architect since the 1980s, Bob Thompson at TVA architects. They did his house, Nike HQ, and about everything else in his business empire, including all the new UofO facilities and Niketown stores. Every single building thus of course looks similar. UofO now resembles a boring corporate campus, more than a school's AD. It's devoid of those individual touches that work together to create something unique and the tradition you constantly build upon. When a group of alumni and the school work together on these projects. Especially in a university/college environment.
Sorry Ducks. You've all adopted "trailer park lottery winner" syndrome because of Knight's checkbook. Win the lottery, move out of the trailer park into a mansion, then try to brag about how hard you had to work to get those digs, and throwing money around to bring attention to yourselves. Expecting everyone who ooh and ahh over you, and pouting when they yawn instead. Trying to buy tradition, instead of working for it. End of day, everyone see's you for what you are. The Paris Hilton of colleges.
To be fair, I really haven't saw very many Oregon fans here that are that out of touch with their current situation. Most seem to know they're new on the scene and are grateful to be in the position they're in and know they've found a different way to promote what they're doing and not necessarily the past. They're all about looking ahead and selling that outlook the best they can.
2 things.
Anyone can agree on this. Cost doesn't always equal best. There are plenty of buildings and facilities that have been built around the world that cost top dollar, but ended up being eye sores and embarrassments.
While there is no doubting Uncle Phil has poured more money into Oregon's athletic facilities than any single individual has in the history of college athletics (over 500 million), all those millions hasn't instantly translated into "best"
Oregon has taken CFB marketing to a new level.
very cool insider vid tour of the facilities..... If you got 12 mins its worth the watch
[YOUTUBE]_umtAnyCfQE&feature=player_detailpage[/YOUTUBE]