- Thread starter
- #21
ATL96Steeler
Well-Known Member
Good point on the money part. I'm just thinking more golfers would go instead of PGA pros. Then again I don't see the need for golf in the Olympics to begin with
Maybe.
The top amateurs in the world typically walk right on the web.com tour and gain status in a yr or so and the very top (Tiger, DeChambeau, Spieth, Phil, Sergio, etc.) get enough sponsors exemptions on the PGAT and Euro Tours and earn a card that way.
My point here is the quality of play shouldn't fall off much (especially from the web.com tour) and these guys are not already playing for $ so they would be the best players to send imo.
I'm with you on the last point, yes, and no...I do understand why the international federation of golf pushed to get golf back in...US, Europe, Australia, have basically dominated golf since forever really. S. Korea got one girl on the LPGAT and she won a couple events and look what spun off...damn near the entire tour is Korean or Asian decent now and they have a lot more that will never make any tour that play golf as a recreation like us.
So exposing golf to India, So. America, China, Africa (aside from So. Africa) other parts of the world can only help the game grow....I just think sending pros was a mistake.