nddulac
Doh! mer
I think he just called his team a bunch of FILHTY BASTHASTYs. (South Carolina YOU FACE!)
No problem, I wore it for 5 days after the other one ... Anyways your boys got schooled by the pirate LOL I would be embarrassed as the # 2 or 3 team
Much happier with a Win on the road with an injury depleted o line than I would be with getting skull dragged by Boston College.
Anyways, enjoy the Ducks avatar.
![]()
"We got all the voters fooled because we beat Georgia"
Anti sec poll bashers are going to have a field day with that quote.
One big difference is that when Oregon had issues with the NCAA, they didn't cop an attitude try to hide them in the hopes that no sanctions would be levied.
Also, I don't understand why USC has so few scholarship athletes, unless they are simply recruiting the wrong people, and the attrition rate is far higher than it should be. 15 new scholarships for five years straight would yield 75 scholarship players. And in many years (because players could be counted against previous years totals) the Trojans signed more than 15 players. So how they end up short by 22 scholarship players is, quite frankly, beyond me.
Voters should have seen their other 3 games. UGA seems like the outlier.
Pretty sure most everyone saw them getting trashed by A&M; it was the first game of the season.
not only did i see, but i was in sc at the time....lots of sad faces in murrells inlet that night.
Most of that was due to the fact that they live in Murrell's Inlet.
Alright. You can count players like Shaw who are either injured or suspended as scholarship losses while claiming a program liek Oregon has a full compliment of 85 scholarship players available. All programs have scholarship players who are not available to play. So you should at least be consistent in how you count players. The number i have ehard for USC is on the order of 60 scholarship players - still well below the maximum of 75 allowed under the current NCAA sanctions. My point was that to have only 60, there had to be a very high attrition rate. And players who are leaving for reasons other than graduation or career-ending injury, should count as players who should not have been recruited in the first place. You mentioned Kiffin - and I would not at all be surprised if he was incompetent in the recruiting area since he was incompetent in so many other areas of program management. At any rate, here are the numbers as I see them:USC gets 15 scollies a year, when kids leave early we lose those kids we can't go over 15. We lost 3 for different issues just before the season started, shaw, Brown and RB who decided he was done with FB.. In 2012 Kiffin only had 12 kids sign letters
when was the last time you were there...its full of northerns like you now.
Wow, so it sucks twice as hard now???
i like to call them halfbacks....retirees that couldnt cut it in florida and didnt want to go all the way back home. they do pay their rent on time though so they got that going for them.
![]()
LOL yea, I bet you would, having 85 scollies and a few injured.. I'd like to see whoreorgan play with 53 scollies and few injured. Your boys wouldn't even be ranked in the top 100