Used 2 B Hu
Baredevil
This is based on politics that happened in the early 90s. Nobody knows how it would go down today. Ann Richards isnt stepping up anytime soon
But Ken Starr will sho-nuff SUE yerass if you don't make with them Mint Juleps
This is based on politics that happened in the early 90s. Nobody knows how it would go down today. Ann Richards isnt stepping up anytime soon
No but Rutgers games are played all over the place in NY. They also are a pretty solid academic institution. Kansas offers neither of these things. From a shear volume standpoint, KC just can't compete.But the Big Ten ALREADY had all those sets in the NYC market, because of all those alumni I mentioned who live here. This is also true of the SEC and ACC, not sure about the PAC or Xii.
Rutgers did not deliver any TV market to the league that wasn't already established.
Rutgers to the BIG seems odd really.
No but Rutgers games are played all over the place in NY.
So when does the SEC make a name change? Are Kentucky, Arkansas, Texas, Missouri all in the southeast?I see what you're saying man. I do. But uhm... It's 14 teams right now. I mean the PAC was smart and changed the name so there was no retardedness.
PAC10->PAC12
Big10->Big14
Big12->SWC
I think having a school in the area means that they can charge cable providers more for the Big Ten Network. Like the whole discussion about the Longhorn Network, and how they can only charge pennies on the dollar outside of the state of Texas. At least when Nebraska was coming in to the Big Ten, cable providers around here had to add BTN to basic cable packages (and pay more for the chance to). It was part of the deal.But the Big Ten ALREADY had all those sets in the NYC market, because of all those alumni I mentioned who live here. This is also true of the SEC and ACC, not sure about the PAC or Xii.
Rutgers did not deliver any TV market to the league that wasn't already established.
That would make more sense to most of us. However, Texas probably would want special considerations. Kansas would be better for basketball.That all sound good but why wouldn't the BIG go after Oklahoma and Texas instead of Kansas.
So when does the SEC make a name change? Are Kentucky, Arkansas, Texas, Missouri all in the southeast?
I think having a school in the area means that they can charge cable providers more for the Big Ten Network.
You're surprised?So that's what is meant by "giving a league a TV market?" Simply being able to gouge the locals???
Fuck football!
Most as in networks. Off the top of my head, this is how I think it breaks down. If I'm wrong, sorry just correct me
Pac 12-Fox, Fox sports 1, Fox sports, ABC, ESPN, 2, U, pac 12 network
Big 12-Fox, Fox sports 1, Fox sports, ABC, ESPN, 2, U, team networks
SEC-CBS, ESPN, 2, U, SEC network (do they play on CBS sports network)
Big-ABC, ESPN, 2, U, Big ten network
ACC-ABC, ESPN, 2, U
What about Tejas?
Shouldnt it be Oklahoma and Texas moving
Pac 16
Northwest division
Washington
WSU
Oregon
OSU
Stanford
Cal
USC
UCLA
Southwest division
AZ
ASU
Utah
Colorado
Texas
tech
Baylor
TCU
Original Pac schools in 1 division, with cali as a recruiting base. Southwest division has Texas as a main recruiting base, and this conference has so many major TV markets its scary. the SEC takes West Virginia and Okie light, ACC gets their choice of Iowa State, k state, or UConn. Everybody wins.
One thing everyone needs to keep in mind: the population shift of this country. The population is moving south, southwest, west.
That's where the numbers will be.
So...the Xii should jump all over New Mexico and NMSU?
Those Big 10 dudes are very snobby about AAU membership in order to be able to play football for some reason.
Heck, they are still trying to deal with the shame and embarassment of Nebraska being booted from the AAU immediately upon joining the Big 10.