Not pretty tonight

[PDay8810]

I don't know Fordman.....at what point do we 86 the redskin fan with continued problems with what Cowboy fans post on the Cowboy board? Bovey is an instigator...always has been. Gotta remember, cowboy fans are discussing their team and three pages into it comes the problem

Who Posted? Total Posts: 120
User NamePostsWarpath 34
Earl Stevens 26
Manster7588 16
Eastbay 10
PDay8810 9
Sharkinva 5
ROMOTOOWENS 5
tw1st3d
4

 

[Warpath]

I don't know Fordman.....at what point do we 86 the redskin fan with continued problems with what Cowboy fans post on the Cowboy board? Bovey is an instigator...always has been. Gotta remember, cowboy fans are discussing their team and three pages into it comes the problem

Who Posted? Total Posts: 120
User NamePostsWarpath 34
Earl Stevens 26
Manster7588 16
Eastbay 10
PDay8810 9
Sharkinva 5
ROMOTOOWENS 5
tw1st3d
4

At what point do we start banning fans like you who rather than try to have a civil conversation, continue to harrass, provoke, insult and do what you can to derail threads... just because a Redskin fan happened to comment? You have the problem. If anyone should be banned, it's someone who acts the way you do.

 

[Warpath]

The funny thing is that's your goal. You instigate, you start shit and then whine afterwards to get someone banned. In your own words, you're a pussy. All you have to do is read the NFC East thoughts thread. 6 pages of good discussion. Then you troll in. But now you want to get someone banned? Whine because I talk back to you the same way you do to me? Hilarious.

 

[Manster7588]

At what point do we start banning fans like you who rather than try to have a civil conversation, continue to harrass, provoke, insult and do what you can to derail threads... just because a Redskin fan happened to comment? You have the problem. If anyone should be banned, it's someone who acts the way you do.

Problem is you don't just want to have a civil conversation. You want to bitch anytime someone says the Skins ar not the best team in the NFCE. Look this is the Cowboys board and many of us have HATED the Skids for decades. If you don't like us bad mouthing the POS team in DC, don't come here to read threads. In other word GTFO....

 

[Warpath]

Problem is you don't just want to have a civil conversation. You want to bitch anytime someone says the Skins ar not the best team in the NFCE. Look this is the Cowboys board and many of us have HATED the Skids for decades. If you don't like us bad mouthing the POS team in DC, don't come here to read threads. In other word GTFO....

Nope. If Fordman would like to ban me, he can do whatever he feels is best.

But, I'm not going to leave because you're butthurt over me saying something contrary to what you believe. If you can't respond to points I make on topics of football without insults and without bringing it to this low point, then don't fucking respond. I'm not here to get into this kind of crap. I saw points that I thought were wrong and argued those points. Feel free to make a counter argument without all the bullshit.

 

[blue jersey jinx]

The funny thing is that's your goal. You instigate, you start shit and then whine afterwards to get someone banned. In your own words, you're a pussy. All you have to do is read the NFC East thoughts thread. 6 pages of good discussion. Then you troll in. But now you want to get someone banned? Whine because I talk back to you the same way you do to me? Hilarious.

Typical foreskin fan. Accuse others of starting shit and then claim they are just here to have conversation. Then you call pday a pussy. Wow. It took a few more sentences, but your true colors just came out. If you were here for true conversation, the name calling would never come up. Typical, hypocritical foreskin fan that can only toot his horn once every 15 years or so, lol.

 

[Warpath]

Typical foreskin fan. Accuse others of starting shit and then claim they are just here to have conversation. Then you call pday a pussy. Wow. It took a few more sentences, but your true colors just came out. If you were here for true conversation, the name calling would never come up. Typical, hypocritical foreskin fan that can only toot his horn once every 15 years or so, lol.

You haven't been paying attention. But continue to make up your own stories if it's entertaining to you.

 

[Earl Stevens]

Our passing game without our two best receiving options is also terrible. See the Carolina game. Griffin's worst game of the season. Offense struggled to move the ball with out Garcon and Davis. But yeah, not significant at all.

LOL, a one-game sample is all you have to go off of. I can count a shitload of games where Garcon or Davis played in the game and had hardly any impact and the Redskins scored a ton of points. They scored like 30 points after Garcon got hurt against the Saints and Davis did nothing. Scored 38 against Minny and Davis did nothing. Scored 28 against the Rams and Davis did nothing. I guess Garcon coming back for the Eagle game was why they scored 31 points with his 3 receptions and 5 yards. You are really reaching here. You point to an anomaly when Washington for the most part did just fine offensively with both missing significant time (or in Garcon's case, being very limited in games).

Are they important to Washington? Nobody is denying that. But they sure as hell aren't linchpins to the Redskins' offense and they can certainly survive without either player. They proved they could even survive without Orakpo (which had more to do with the fact that their offense was elite), but Orakpo is still Pro Bowl-to-All Pro caliber and they need him to be better defensively. Davis and Garcon aren't really close to the caliber that Orakpo is.

 

[Warpath]

I don't know how to tell you this Earl, But Garcon and Davis played in the same game together once last year. That being game one vs. the Saints. Past that one was injured for one half of the season and the other was injured for the other half.

The Carolina game was the only game in which they didn't have both.

They didn't do fine without Garcon, they lost every game but one that he missed.

 

[tw1st3d]

I don't know how to tell you this Earl, But Garcon and Davis played in the same game together once last year. That being game one vs. the Saints. Past that one was injured for one half of the season and the other was injured for the other half.

The Carolina game was the only game in which they didn't have both.

They didn't do fine without Garcon, they lost every game but one that he missed.

Just curious.....


Does the skins board suck so bad that you live on the Cowboys board? At some point it's past debate.... and just becomes trolling. If you think you made your point smile big.... if you don't think you have... you already lost .....

 

[Eastbay]

I have a feeling we will be seeing less and less off Bovey once the season kicks into gear........

#The return of the "Catfish"

 

[Earl Stevens]

I don't know how to tell you this Earl, But Garcon and Davis played in the same game together once last year. That being game one vs. the Saints. Past that one was injured for one half of the season and the other was injured for the other half.

The Carolina game was the only game in which they didn't have both.

They didn't do fine without Garcon, they lost every game but one that he missed.

They still went 10-6 and had a top 5 offense considering the situation. Your argument holds little weight considering they actually won two games without Garcon and essentially three if you count the Saints' game. And in half of the games Garcon missed, Davis was not highly effective, yet they still managed to score a lot of points. And in Garcon's first game back, he was as effective as salt in a slug farm, yet they dropped 31 points on the Eagles. The Redskins simply got hot at the right time to finish the season. They didn't magically lose and win games based on Garcon's presence or lack thereof. Which is basically what one could imply from your arguments.

Sorry, a WR (and furthermore, a TE) is not that important in the grand scheme of things, not even the elite ones. And even through this all, Garcon was never really close to 100% even in the games he played. So your arguments aren't really convincing to me. Now tell me about how you didn't have Orakpo last year, because that had a big impact on a poor pass rush. Garcon and Davis didn't seem to have that big of an impact considering Washington still sported a top 5 offense over the course of the season with both of them missing significant time. A one game sample against Carolina and a seven-game winning streak isn't clear-cut evidence that Garcon is of vital importance. That was more coincidence than anything.

 

[blue jersey jinx]

I don't drink. Never have. I don't smoke, never have. I don't do drugs, never have. I witnessed deaths in my family and ruined lives of family members at an early age. Enough to where I didn't want any part of any of it myself. If you want to make judgements about me and my choices... You can fuck off. You want to attack me personally and call me a liar, you can fuck off.

Constant profanity is a weakness and a sign of lack of intelligence.

 

[Warpath]

Just curious.....


Does the skins board suck so bad that you live on the Cowboys board? At some point it's past debate.... and just becomes trolling. If you think you made your point smile big.... if you don't think you have... you already lost .....

I post on the Redskins board as well. If you don't want to see me posting here then don't respond to me or ask me questions. Seems counter intuitive.

 

[Warpath]

Constant profanity is a weakness and a sign of lack of intelligence.

Profanity is used by people of all levels of intelligence. People who only pay attention to the profane words and avoid the points lack intelligence.

 

[Warpath]

They still went 10-6 and had a top 5 offense considering the situation. Your argument holds little weight considering they actually won two games without Garcon and essentially three if you count the Saints' game.

You really want to include the Saints game? Dude had over 100 yards and a TD in the first quarter before his injury. Was part of the reason the Redskins won that game.

And while they won two games without him, how many did they lose without him?

It's your points that make zero sense and hold no weight.

The lose of Garcon was critical for the Redskins. It doesn't make any sense to argue against it.

 

[Manster7588]

Profanity is used by people of all levels of intelligence. People who only pay attention to the profane words and avoid the points lack intelligence.

You sure the fuck seem to full of fucking fear of the Cowboys. The fear that your ONE year out of the Cellar must be really pulling at your fucking nads.

 

[Warpath]

You sure the fuck seem to full of fucking fear of the Cowboys. The fear that your ONE year out of the Cellar must be really pulling at your fucking nads.

I have no fear of the Redskins returning to the cellar. Or any fear that they won't build off of last year and continue to be a good team for a while, with RG3 as their QB.

That really seems to fucking annoy you

 

[Manster7588]

I have no fear of the Redskins returning to the cellar. Or any fear that they won't build off of last year and continue to be a good team for a while, with RG3 as their QB.

That really seems to fucking annoy you

Then why are you here so fucking much? You fucking troll. Hell now eastbay can troll away on you board and blame you. TROLL.

 

[Warpath]

Then why are you here so fucking much? You fucking troll. Hell now eastbay can troll away on you board and blame you. TROLL.

No, actually, he can't. But, thanks for the concern.