Not pretty tonight

[blue jersey jinx]

I don't drink. Never have. I don't smoke, never have. I don't do drugs, never have. I witnessed deaths in my family and ruined lives of family members at an early age. Enough to where I didn't want any part of any of it myself. If you want to make judgements about me and my choices... You can fuck off. You want to attack me personally and call me a liar, you can fuck off.

Maybe you should at least try one or all of the above mentioned. It might make you a nicer person.

 

[Warpath]

Maybe you should at least try one or all of the above mentioned. It might make you a nicer person.

Do you really want to insult someone's intelligence and follow it up with an idiotic post like this one?

Since you want to take the conversation down this path, Did you try drugs or alcohol to fit in with the crowd or something along those lines? I ask, because that would seem to be typical behavior of someone who's a Cowboy fan, St. Louis Cardinals fan and a Boston Bruins fan all wrapped in one. Lakers or Celtics?

 

[Eastbay]

No, actually, he can't. But, thanks for the concern.

Mark my words you will not be around her for long...........

 

[Manster7588]

No, actually, he can't. But, thanks for the concern.

Why Not? That's your excuse. And if I'm not mistaking you have been here a lot more than East has been on the skids page. TROLL

 

[Warpath]

Why Not? That's your excuse. And if I'm not mistaking you have been here a lot more than East has been on the skids page. TROLL

I'm not sure what you're talking about as far as "That's your excuse"... I haven't made any excuses for posting on this forum other than talking football.

But Eastbay was banned from the Redskins page for actual trolling. , that's why.

I'm sure you had a great point in your head somewhere though.

 

[Eastbay]

I'm not sure what you're talking about as far as "That's your excuse"... I haven't made any excuses for posting on this forum other than talking football.

But Eastbay was banned from the Redskins page for actual trolling. , that's why.

I'm sure you had a great point in your head somewhere though.

Eastbay was banned because you bitched & moaned to the Mods every chance you got, now you bring your punk ass here and think you gonna get some respect. No one respects nor want to talk football with your Pansy ass, so keeping it moving Fish eyed Fool!

# Fuck You & the "Catfish"!

 

[PDay8810]

would seem bovey like.....complain like no other only to become what he complained about

 

[Warpath]

Eastbay was banned because you bitched & moaned to the Mods every chance you got, now you bring your punk ass here and think you gonna get some respect. No one respects nor want to talk football with your Pansy ass, so keeping it moving Fish eyed Fool!

# Fuck You & the "Catfish"!

Cool story. I haven't talked to any moderator about anyone. Don't need to, because unlike ESPN, they have moderators who are active participants on the forum. And they smelled your bullshit the minute you registered.

 

[Warpath]

would seem bovey like.....complain like no other only to become what he complained about

Only, I haven't done anything remotely similar. Funny too, since you were on the Skins forum right as a Cowboy game was about to start. Goofy dude.

 

[Earl Stevens]

You really want to include the Saints game? Dude had over 100 yards and a TD in the first quarter before his injury. Was part of the reason the Redskins won that game.

And while they won two games without him, how many did they lose without him?

It's your points that make zero sense and hold no weight.

The lose of Garcon was critical for the Redskins. It doesn't make any sense to argue against it.

Yeah I'm including the Saints game. The game they still went on to score 40 points even after he got hurt. You say "critical to the Redskins" when I fucking already said the same thing. I said his loss was not of vital importance. Literally everybody else knew what the fuck I meant when I said of vital importance. But only you had to take exception because you are a homer who thinks Garcon is anything above average at the WR position when he isn't. You keep bringing up wins and losses like that fucking means something. When the point was how their offense managed to do just fine with and without him. If wins and losses mean so much, then Orakpo wasn't missed at all and you didn't need him, even though your pass rush was fucking horrible all year long. Meanwhile your offense was still elite with and without those average fucking scrubs you keep over-hyping.

 

[Warpath]

Garçon is an above average wr when healthy. And Davis is an above average TE as well. You can keep calling them average though if you like. You can also continue to ignore facts like points scored without Garçon as opposed to with him. And continue to ignore their record with and without him. Because if you ignore facts, your argument actually makes sense.

 

[Earl Stevens]

If you can show to me some sort of statistical data or empirical evidence that Davis or Garcon are anything above average at their positions, I'll shut the fuck up.

 

[Warpath]

No you won't. And I already did.

 

[Earl Stevens]

Garçon is an above average wr when healthy. And Davis is an above average TE as well. You can keep calling them average though if you like. You can also continue to ignore facts like points scored without Garçon as opposed to with him. And continue to ignore their record with and without him. Because if you ignore facts, your argument actually makes sense.

There is no evidence whatsoever to suggest this.

And what points scored without him? Where are your facts? I've seen nothing in this thread that proves this to be true. I know the Redskins had a top 5 offense virtually all year long with both missing significant time. There's no facts for me to ignore because you provided none other than pointing out blatantly obvious "facts" such as their record with Garcon while completely leaving out important variables. Such as the fact that they won games when he wasn't even effective in them and was never the best player on the field at any point in either of those games for the Redskins. Such as the fact that their schedule was significantly weaker over the 2nd half of the season. And as a "team" the Redskins improved in the 2nd half. It wasn't just because Garcon was back. The defense improve somewhat as well.

 

[Manster7588]

I'm not sure what you're talking about as far as "That's your excuse"... I haven't made any excuses for posting on this forum other than talking football.

But Eastbay was banned from the Redskins page for actual trolling. , that's why.

I'm sure you had a great point in your head somewhere though.

Are you really that dense? You stated on a few occasions you are here because Eastbay trolls your board. A mod has already told you Eastbay has been told to quit, and last I checked he has, yet you still insist on bringing you whinny "Why can't you guys love my Skins" crying ass here and complain about us down talking the skins. If you don't like the way we talk about the fucking skids leave. If I visit you fucking board I wouldn't expect any love coming our way, so why should we send any that way. ass bitch....

 

[Earl Stevens]

No you won't. And I already did.

All I saw was "my guy is important to my favorite team, and we lost games without him, and won most games with them." Leaving out important variables in the process and using small sample sizes. You've proved nothing.

 

[Earl Stevens]

LOL at saying Davis and Garcon are above average. This is dude worst troll job yet. I guess dudes like Marfaillus Bennett and Nate Washington are above average too.

 

[Warpath]

Are you really that dense? You stated on a few occasions you are here because Eastbay trolls your board. A mod has already told you Eastbay has been told to quit, and last I checked he has, yet you still insist on bringing you whinny "Why can't you guys love my Skins" crying ass here and complain about us down talking the skins. If you don't like the way we talk about the fucking skids leave. If I visit you fucking board I wouldn't expect any love coming our way, so why should we send any that way. ass bitch....

Never said anything like that. You sound like an angry drunk making shit up as you go.

 

[Warpath]

LOL at saying Davis and Garcon are above average. This is dude worst troll job yet. I guess dudes like Marfaillus Bennett and Nate Washington are above average too.

If you think saying certain players are above average is trolling, you're an idiot.

 

[Warpath]

Earl...

With Garcon the Redskins scored 31.25 points per game
Without Garcon the Redskins scored 23.25 points per game
In the one game without Garcon AND Davis, only 13 points

And we've already discussed the win loss record with and without him.

Go ahead and continue to ignore the facts.