I wouldn't go that far at all. I do think his upside is higher than just about any player Ive seen recently but Im definitely not convinced he is a sure thing.
I think he's close there is a lot of quality defense in this draft too . I'm not sold on Trubisky either tho. I actually like Watson and Mahoney upside more. And as far as raw Qbs have Kizer over him as well. With Darnold, Rosen, Mayfield, Falk just naming a few. And other positions thinning out that are deeper in this years draft. I'm not sure any teams should go QB in the first round. A lot of scouts were saying there was more talk about Darnold at the combine. Than the QBs that were actually there. See how the season goes
I agree. He is going to be a pro bowler somewhere in your secondary.
I liked the mixon pick. As long as he keeps the off the field problems in check. He may arguably be the best RB in this draft. He was very impressive on the field . And posted great numbers at Oklahomas pro day.What are your thoughts nos?
Too many RBs in this draft to go after Mixon, imo.
I agree. I do find it interesting that the bulk of the talk was how far he was going to drop. Some experts even went as far as to claim he was undeaftable. And that's seemed to take a turn. He's getting some buzz now. Following his pro day and a few other things. To where it seems more like teams are looking at him. A lot more like how far can we let him slide before grabbing him.
I agree I don't see him dropping real far. But he may have been top 10 if he had it together. It is a good draft for backs. Im not a fan of McCaffery tho. But I am a little biased on that.
Theres a lot of possible smoke going on right now.
Webb may actually be a good value. But if I'm a team in need of a QB I'm waiting until at least the 2nd round. With next years QB draft class. I would think about loading on weapons this year. And aiming QB next year.
I cross referenced it to Walter Footballs needs which are pretty damn accurate and he was missing a few things. He had enough picks to at least attempt to fill them all and then some. If anything you should be able to hit the top ones with that many picks.
As someone said before it goes in tiers. If the actually BPA isn't a need you could still pick them if they are that good or trade back get more picks and get the next tier down that's a need. OF course you may not be able to trade down. You could also trade up and get the BPA at your position. In a perfect world you slide up and down as needed that makes for a killer draft.
I agree with the tier method. But i do think there are several variables that determine BPA. Talent level of a player,Need,Fit..... And when you add the flow of the draft. Depth at position and availability becomes another factor. BPA can take on many meanings . The ultimate goal is coming out of the draft with the biggest improvement to your team as possible .Filling team needs is important to hit that goal imo
Yes agreed but its hard for everyone to judge this without looking at the team needs and overall knowing how much they did improve their team. As I said before being a fan of the Fins I would be ecstatic with this draft they would not only be better now but more prepared for the future by getting younger at positions that are aging. Casual observers would have no clue. I like Stokes evaluation after the draft as that would at least show how well you drafted in comparison to the league and you get bonuses for hitting needs.
Itsca tough call. Personally I think he's by far one of the best talent wise in the draft. But the off the field actions. Are too much of a risk for me to feel comfortable. With the Raiders picking him unless he seriously dropped. Feeling a lot better with Lynch signing regardless of his age. He seems very excited to be a raider. That Oakland/New England game in Mexico just got a lot more interesting imo
I'm looking forward to the post draft evaluations. As well as seeing how close we all came during the draft
