Don't be mad Patsfan, at least you learned something about illegal lineman downfield, an exception I explained early on that you didn't want to concede in any regard because a 3X SB Champ tweeted otherwise.
Thanks for that TP!
OK thanks CPT Obvious. I mean I thought he was downfield fishingDon't be mad Patsfan, at least you learned something about illegal lineman downfield, an exception I explained early on that you didn't want to concede in any regard because a 3X SB Champ tweeted otherwise.
glad we have you to mentor us
.
Thanks for that TP!
Them refs don't always see it exactly like the video cameras do, hence the need for official reviews, even then they have to say 'confirmed' or 'stands' because even the video camera may not capture the actual play.
But since they don't review penalties in the NFL we fans just have to live with the calls on the field. For me, it's a lot easier to live with when we see that it's turns out to be an infraction by ~1 yard or something like that instead of the ~5 yards shown on that twitter screen shot.
Like I said before dbldwn, too much smoke for me to not believe that this MAY have been one of the first sparks in a long dirty laundry list of a bonfire of improper video tapping practices. (I'll give you may have been, that's something, no?)Ok. Can you now acknowledge the Pats didn't tape the Rams walk thru!!
I don't mind being proven wrong Patsfan (Pretty sure you do though) It provides opportunity to grow, not that everyone will.OK thanks CPT Obvious. I mean I thought he was downfield fishing
Go grind your axe somewhere else you've been proven wrong here at every turn.
I thought that was weird too...... Sationary?
)
I thought that was weird too...... Sationary?
Did you notice the exception? If they get knocked back behind the LOS after they disengage. I guess that can very well happen if you are just 'stationary' during a live play....
(Okay, the rule actually says 'forced back' but I think if your dumbass is just standing there it's gonna be more like 'knocked' on your backside back behind the LOS
Obviously your reading comprehension could use some work as well if you took my mentorship comment seriouslyI don't mind being proven wrong Patsfan (Pretty sure you do though) It provides opportunity to grow, not that everyone will.
You are a very angry cat, you threw a lot of negativity my way in our exchanges, oh well... Be who you are I guess, just so you know (Since you acknowledge me as some sort of mentor for you) it's a sign of weakness and loss of control, so you may want to rethink that.
Cheers Brother!
Hope to see both our teams in the Superbowl by seasons end!
You seem cool enough Patsfan, most Northeast folks I've run into are, so I've given you the benefit of the doubt with some of your rude comments thrown my way.Obviously your reading comprehension could use some work as well if you took my mentorship comment seriously
Keep on spinning VitaMix it's what you do well. Next time I want to have a debate with someone who didn't even see the play in question I'll be sure to look you up
I'll be charging up my camera batteries just in case Bill needs any help for the SB walk through
Free axe grinding that way------->
You seem cool enough Patsfan, most Northeast folks I've run into are, so I've given you the benefit of the doubt with some of your rude comments thrown my way.
Funny you joke about my reading comprehension skills though, when you choose to engage in debate with another who admitted from the start that they didn't see the play, and based a speculation on why the refs may have picked up the flag based on that screen shot alone. You sort of act like I threw that in there midway and blindsided you with it.
Honestly though, I thought Mad Mike was to blame for losing that SB to you guys, he is a stubborn son of a gun, sort of like you, lol.
I mean IF indeed there was more too it than just a straight up ass kicking the Pats put on the Rams, it took Martz a full 3 quarters before he figured out he needed to mix things up. And according to Rams players, they discussed at length during the long SB half time that Bill's Boyz were always in the right spot on all the plays they drew up specifically for the Super Bowl. They talked about how the New England defense checked out of their defensive set, to defensive sets that matched up perfectly on plays they had never ran in the past and had only practiced in the walk through.
Don't know if that half time report of events is true, but Martz, Faulk, Bruce & Holt all have confirmed that discussion took place at half time. Whether the Pats had a intell or not is irrelevant to me, because if your opponent is lining up perfectly to defend specific plays, then they needed to scrape those plays like they finally did & mix it up much sooner than going into the 4th quarter.
TBH I wish the Pats organization never had any controversial video tapping practices, but they have and that part can't be denied. If they never did, I could easily discredit that SB walk through allegation as much as you. The one that makes me just laugh out loud, is when Josh McDaniels got caught illegally taping the pregame walkthrough for Denver in London.
Remind me of this ....
They want everything black and white, but I'm with you....
