- Thread starter
- #1
I really hate that rule. He caught the damn ball, but somehow it’s not a catch.
It was moving. And then the ground helped him pull it in. It's not a catch.
I understand the rule, but he did catch the ball. It’s a shit rule.
But he didn't maintain possession to the ground.
But he didn't maintain possession to the ground.
It was moving. And then the ground helped him pull it in. It's not a catch.
But, if it were a Pats player......you'd be bitching about it......right?
I'd be bitching. But it wouldn't change the fact that it was the right call.
He caught it.....it started moving around when he was coming down and stretching out to reach across the goal line.
I understand the rule, but he did catch the ball. It’s a shit rule.
On a pass, you need to maintain possession to the ground. If it was a run, you'd be right.